Date: June 26th, 2026 12:29 AM Author: Electric ceo
i have a couple hundred (and growing) unread books, i read one book at a time, then often switch genres to the next based on intuition (nonfiction to fiction, light to heavy, science fiction to history, etc) unless i hit a topic that requires a deepdive (like the chabad or cybernetics materials), then i read as many books as i feel necessary to get a hold of the topic. i write as a way primarily to synthesize the enormous amount of disparate strands of thoughts in my psyche; i have close to 100 unpublished posts, most of which will not be published. i also keep two personal journals on top of that, and i'm also continuing my grind of my two and a half men series watch/analysis
i'm currently reading craig bartholomew's commentary on ecclesiastes. his is not the right approach for me, although it's good enough to finish it - the protestant perspective in general is too surface oriented, it denies the unconscious and offloads the crucifixion of opposites onto the text of the bible itself, and for that reason is it boring and kind of sick. bartholomew does not feel phenomenologically the philosophical pessimism that permeates ecclesiastes, it's an academic and intellectual exercise to him. i ordered two other commentaries which i think will round out the material better
but my process is not your process and your process is not mine, we all have a specific and unique life purpose to fulfill
Date: June 26th, 2026 12:07 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability
What you just wrote is some straight up aalewis shit, except you're a middle aged man. It's stunning you maintain this delusion of intellectual superiority and insight when literally everyone thinks you're a retard. You'd think with all your essays and spam at least one person would have something positive to say about you, or that the lack of it would trigger at least some self-awareness.
Date: June 26th, 2026 12:37 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability
If you don't like being mocked you're free to move on. You spend all day here when everyone thinks you're an annoying retarded kike. Stop acting like a kike -- if you don't want to be mocked maybe stop coming to a place where everyone mocks you.
Date: June 26th, 2026 2:13 PM Author: Electric ceo
The symbol of a cross is a very powerful one and relates, in my opinion, to humanity being torn between the heavens and the earth, between materiality and spirituality. In the modern era we are increasingly being asked to carry our own cross like Christ. Not just Jung but Kierkegaard, Weil, berdyaev speak close to my language. I have yet to read Jakob bohme, eckhart , Nicholas of cusa but they are on my list and I suspect they will probably resonate as well
I just disagree with the privatio boni - god as all good, evil as a deprivation of goodness - and see God as totality, the horrifying unity of opposites, including evil
Date: June 26th, 2026 3:43 PM Author: Electric ceo
luther's not on my list to do a deepdive on, but i did do a deepdive on robert lewis dabny which may or may not eventually be posted (it would need a substantial rewrite)
every institution draws boundaries over what is orthodoxy vs what is heresy, where what is disallowed is suppressed into the unconscious. protestantism denies the unconscious itself, catholicism historically has denied the feminine. judaism denies the equal value of the non-jew
Date: June 26th, 2026 3:49 PM Author: Overrated Carmine Lettuce
I'm not evaluating the relative merits of doctrinal systems to expose each's flaw in order to put forward my own (deficient) psycho-religious alternative.
I'm telling you that Luther's insight into the unapproachability of God isn't the triviality you're making it out to be.
The danger of encountering the naked tremendum should not be scoffed at as a simple "suppression."