https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pizXzR7ZQ8Q

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40578786)

nerds & geeks = libs

the latter fills most tech jobs. the former is usually doing hvac repair or some kind of real estate broker agent gig

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40578790)

finance is pretty conservative and is still more profitable than tech. tech is just faster growing and no longer cares about profits in a zero rate world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40578801)

To the extent it was ever conservative it was because the marriage of free trade globalism and low taxes espoused by Rs benefitted it greatly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579000)

still infinitely more conservative than tech fags.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579218)

we make fun of libs all the time

way better than working at facebook

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579285)

and certainly buyside finance is more conservative than tech. a lot of them might be Mitt Romney types, but they aren't screeching blue-haired pansexuals either

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579325)

214. To avoid this, a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists. Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology. Leftism is collectivist; it seeks to bind together the entire world (both nature and the human race) into a unified whole. But this implies management of nature and of human life by organized society, and it requires advanced technology. You can’t have a united world without rapid transportation and communication, you can’t make all people love one another without sophisticated psychological techniques, you can’t have a “planned society” without the necessary technological base. Above all, leftism is driven by the need for power, and the leftist seeks power on a collective basis, through identification with a mass movement or an organization. Leftism is unlikely ever to give up technology, because technology is too valuable a source of collective power.

215. The anarchist [34] too seeks power, but he seeks it on an individual or small-group basis; he wants individuals and small groups to be able to control the circumstances of their own lives. He opposes technology because it makes small groups dependent on large organizations.

216. Some leftists may seem to oppose technology, but they will oppose it only so long as they are outsiders and the technological system is controlled by non-leftists. If leftism ever becomes dominant in society, so that the technological system becomes a tool in the hands of leftists,they will enthusiastically use it and promote its growth. In doing this they will be repeating a pattern that leftism has shown again and again in the past. When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists were a minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous proponents of academic freedom, but today, in those of our universities where leftists have become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to take away from everyone else’s academic freedom. (This is “political correctness.”) The same will happen with leftists and technology: They will use it to oppress everyone else if they ever get it under their own control.

------------------

229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude toward individualism.He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun control, for sex education and other psychologically “en-lightened” educational methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against violence, but he often finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He is fond of using the common catch-phrases of the left, like “racism,” “sexism,”“homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,” “genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of these movements is al-most certainly a leftist. [36]

230. The more dangerous leftists, that is, those who are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However,the most dangerous leftists of all may be certain oversocialized types who avoid irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened” psychological techniques for socializing children,dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth.These crypto-leftists (as we may call them) approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned, but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect his way of life,or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average bourgeois.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40578818)

it used to be full of hard right wingers. the median was probably crank libertarianism.

but look at the grief peter thiel has to put up with these days. he barely hangs on and he's fucking peter thiel. anyone less has to hide or run.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40578988)

https://www.teamblind.com/post/Black-Owned-Banks-Recommendations-Hvn3GmZY

https://www.teamblind.com/post/BLM-at-work-wLpeiDt3

https://www.teamblind.com/search/blm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579280)

most of these tech engineers in a different time and place where tech was conservative would be parroting those same conservative principles, attending church and supporting family and nation and even white culture.

likewise, all these "woke" young white women are the exact same women would would have gotten caught up in something like prohibition in the early 20th century, or some protestant religious awakening. they just don't realize it or have enough wherewithal to admit it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579500)

Hmmm...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4580654&forum_id=2#40579493)