The Origins of AIDS
| Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | Curious toilet seat patrolman | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | gold hairraiser chad | 09/18/21 | | Curious toilet seat patrolman | 09/18/21 | | irradiated piazza | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | Garnet chapel | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | Curious toilet seat patrolman | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | Curious toilet seat patrolman | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | irradiated piazza | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 | | Stirring lettuce striped hyena | 09/18/21 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: September 18th, 2021 1:46 PM Author: Stirring lettuce striped hyena
Interesting. I have questions about not just polio, but a whole host of illnesses that have been discovered in Africa. There was at one time considerable debate over whether the African AIDS epidemic was overstated. People were traveling around Africa, finding people with a broad range of symptoms that were all over the map, finding them to be HIV+, and then diagnosing them with AIDS (which was now defined as a disease that could cause any symptom you can imagine before causing a specific type of cancer). One criticism of the contemporary science of AIDS is that our definition of AIDS distracts us from the cancer it causes, and that AIDS should be thought of primarily as a kind of cancer.
That's what drew me to this issue in the first place. My fundamental interest here is in understanding what CANCER is. We have not only overlooked the role of viruses in causing cancer, we have treated viral causes of cancer as somehow fundamentally different from other causes of cancer. That may be a mistake, since one characteristic of cancer is that it generally takes a very long time for it to develop. Why would both chemical pollutants and viruses have this characteristic that they cause cancer, but only many years (usually many decades) after exposure?
Bottom line is I don't think we can have a fully informed debate about vaccines and zoonotic viruses until we clarify the terms of the debate. I think putting cancer and cancer risks at the center of debate helps clarify thinking, and is probably the more "scientific" way to approach these issues. Even if Hamilton's theory was off, Hooper was doing valid scientific inquiry that was terminated for reasons that had nothing to do with science.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4924216&forum_id=2#43136967) |
Date: September 18th, 2021 1:55 PM Author: Stirring lettuce striped hyena
Currently watching this btw:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFph7-6t34M&t=15684s
Edit: nevermind not worth watching for 5 minutes
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4924216&forum_id=2#43137002) |
|
|