\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Lawyers, lawpill me on the latest Nestle Supreme Court case

What's the deal there? Where do you stand? Discuss
Gay range
  09/22/21
https://www.lawfareblog.com/supreme-court-hears-oral-argumen...
Gay range
  09/22/21
There are no lawyers here
Gay range
  09/23/21
...
Gay range
  09/23/21
Didn’t Nestle already win? Much like the Logan Act, ...
peach senate
  09/23/21
I just want a better grip on the case with a few sizzling ho...
Gay range
  09/23/21


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 22nd, 2021 9:02 PM
Author: Gay range

What's the deal there? Where do you stand?

Discuss

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43161589)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 22nd, 2021 9:05 PM
Author: Gay range

https://www.lawfareblog.com/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-nestlé-v-doe-and-cargill-v-doe

Especially interested in EPAH's take

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43161599)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2021 12:00 AM
Author: Gay range

There are no lawyers here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43162426)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2021 6:20 AM
Author: Gay range



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43163022)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2021 6:33 AM
Author: peach senate

Didn’t Nestle already win?

Much like the Logan Act, Alien Tort Statute needs to be read as understood in 1790.

Also always make sure your in house lawyers add a clause to your contracts stating that “VENDOR avers and avows and hereby declares that it does practice SLAVERY or INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE as described by the THIRTEENTH (13TH) AMENDMENT TO THE US CONSTITUTION.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43163038)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2021 6:35 AM
Author: Gay range

I just want a better grip on the case with a few sizzling hot takes on the side as leftist friends will not stop blowing my inbox up with complaints and icy cold takes about this latest battle in the War on Law

Had to listen to a divisive dinner conversation about this where all parties were poorly informed yet extremely passionate about the FACTS of the CASE and the social implications arising from it. Had very little to say about it (didn't know anything about it) so I just sipped my coffee and kept trying to change the subject but they were LOCKED ON to this worse than a crocodile on the arm of an Egyptian orphan swimming in the Nile

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4927734&forum_id=2#43163041)