Do they still print soldier of fortune magazine?
| Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner | 11/27/21 | | swollen burgundy scourge upon the earth | 11/27/21 | | Cracking telephone | 11/27/21 | | Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner | 11/27/21 | | Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner | 11/27/21 | | Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner | 11/27/21 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 27th, 2021 10:08 PM Author: Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner
Wrongful death Edit
In February 1985, John Wayne Hearn, a Vietnam veteran, shot and killed Sandra Black for a $10,000 payment from her husband, Robert Black. Black communicated with Hearn through a classified advertisement published in Soldier of Fortune, wherein Hearn solicited "high-risk assignments. U.S. or overseas". In 1989, Sandra Black's son Gary and her mother Marjorie Eimann filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against SOF magazine and its parent publishing company Omega Group Ltd., seeking $21 million in redress of their grievance.[13]
The jury found Soldier of Fortune grossly negligent in publishing Hearn's classified ad for implicit illegal activity (murder) and awarded the plaintiffs $9.5 million in damages. However, in 1990 the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the verdict, saying that the standard of conduct imposed upon the magazine was too high, because the advertisement was ambiguously worded
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4974036&forum_id=2#43519901) |
|
Date: November 27th, 2021 10:08 PM Author: Arousing chartreuse philosopher-king corner
Wrongful death Edit
In February 1985, John Wayne Hearn, a Vietnam veteran, shot and killed Sandra Black for a $10,000 payment from her husband, Robert Black. Black communicated with Hearn through a classified advertisement published in Soldier of Fortune, wherein Hearn solicited "high-risk assignments. U.S. or overseas". In 1989, Sandra Black's son Gary and her mother Marjorie Eimann filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against SOF magazine and its parent publishing company Omega Group Ltd., seeking $21 million in redress of their grievance.[13]
The jury found Soldier of Fortune grossly negligent in publishing Hearn's classified ad for implicit illegal activity (murder) and awarded the plaintiffs $9.5 million in damages. However, in 1990 the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the verdict, saying that the standard of conduct imposed upon the magazine was too high, because the advertisement was ambiguously worded
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4974036&forum_id=2#43519904) |
|
|