Dating apps and a drastically changing relationship landscape
| misunderstood nowag | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | Alcoholic affirmative action | 08/12/22 | | Overrated Library | 08/12/22 | | passionate chapel | 08/13/22 | | free-loading marketing idea roommate | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | misunderstood nowag | 08/12/22 | | Concupiscible Chartreuse Alpha Range | 08/12/22 | | dashing office | 08/12/22 | | Bearded fear-inspiring trump supporter | 08/12/22 | | free-loading marketing idea roommate | 08/12/22 | | lemon 180 forum pozpig | 08/12/22 | | ruddy stimulating partner garrison | 08/14/22 | | Excitant Domesticated Plaza | 08/12/22 | | Floppy whorehouse | 08/12/22 | | alcoholic kitchen | 08/12/22 | | Floppy whorehouse | 08/12/22 | | Vibrant cream jewess | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | drab blathering macaca | 08/12/22 | | big claret gas station son of senegal | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | big claret gas station son of senegal | 08/12/22 | | misunderstood nowag | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | Iridescent roast beef menage | 08/12/22 | | Overrated Library | 08/12/22 | | Misanthropic Appetizing Crackhouse | 08/13/22 | | passionate chapel | 08/13/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | dashing office | 08/12/22 | | red electric furnace turdskin | 08/12/22 | | Rusted chest-beating principal's office | 08/12/22 | | impressive poppy address yarmulke | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | Exhilarant stead mad-dog skullcap | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | Concupiscible Chartreuse Alpha Range | 08/12/22 | | Exhilarant stead mad-dog skullcap | 08/12/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/12/22 | | Marvelous french chef chad | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/13/22 | | Big-titted market | 08/12/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/12/22 | | onyx piazza lettuce | 08/12/22 | | Magenta infuriating field | 08/13/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | impressive poppy address yarmulke | 08/12/22 | | Marvelous french chef chad | 08/12/22 | | Overrated Library | 08/12/22 | | comical university | 08/12/22 | | Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig | 08/12/22 | | passionate chapel | 08/13/22 | | Iridescent roast beef menage | 08/12/22 | | arousing henna juggernaut resort | 08/12/22 | | Provocative ticket booth | 08/12/22 | | Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig | 08/12/22 | | Concupiscible Chartreuse Alpha Range | 08/12/22 | | comical university | 08/12/22 | | Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig | 08/12/22 | | Provocative ticket booth | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | Concupiscible Chartreuse Alpha Range | 08/12/22 | | misunderstood nowag | 08/12/22 | | passionate chapel | 08/13/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | arousing henna juggernaut resort | 08/12/22 | | Startled wine national security agency | 08/13/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/13/22 | | Provocative ticket booth | 08/13/22 | | Misanthropic Appetizing Crackhouse | 08/14/22 | | Unhinged Hairraiser Public Bath | 08/12/22 | | Thriller degenerate | 08/12/22 | | pungent razzle cuck | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | Floppy whorehouse | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig | 08/12/22 | | pungent razzle cuck | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | Exhilarant stead mad-dog skullcap | 08/12/22 | | pungent razzle cuck | 08/13/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/14/22 | | comical university | 08/12/22 | | Concupiscible Chartreuse Alpha Range | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/12/22 | | fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold | 08/12/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/13/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/13/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/14/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/12/22 | | comical university | 08/12/22 | | magical cerebral set | 08/12/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/12/22 | | ruddy stimulating partner garrison | 08/14/22 | | lemon 180 forum pozpig | 08/12/22 | | lemon 180 forum pozpig | 08/12/22 | | Crimson irradiated stock car ceo | 08/12/22 | | Startled wine national security agency | 08/12/22 | | titillating patrolman | 08/12/22 | | arousing henna juggernaut resort | 08/12/22 | | Marvelous french chef chad | 08/13/22 | | Navy Insane Space | 08/13/22 | | Startled wine national security agency | 08/13/22 | | Iridescent roast beef menage | 08/14/22 | | gaped abnormal stag film circlehead | 08/13/22 | | magical cerebral set | 08/13/22 | | racy mint giraffe den | 08/13/22 | | useless motley police squad halford | 08/13/22 | | misunderstood nowag | 08/14/22 | | Lascivious doobsian trailer park | 08/13/22 | | arousing henna juggernaut resort | 08/13/22 | | Lascivious doobsian trailer park | 08/13/22 | | big claret gas station son of senegal | 08/14/22 | | misunderstood nowag | 08/14/22 | | swollen pit shitlib | 08/14/22 | | Magenta infuriating field | 08/13/22 | | Iridescent roast beef menage | 08/14/22 | | swollen pit shitlib | 08/14/22 | | big claret gas station son of senegal | 08/14/22 | | Iridescent roast beef menage | 08/14/22 | | Thriller degenerate | 08/14/22 | | Diverse Masturbator | 08/14/22 | | Crimson irradiated stock car ceo | 08/14/22 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 12th, 2022 11:12 AM Author: misunderstood nowag
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/the-state-our-unions/202208/the-rise-lonely-single-men
The Rise of Lonely, Single Men
Dating apps and a drastically changing relationship landscape.
Posted August 9, 2022 | Reviewed by Hara Estroff Marano
Share on FacebookShare
Share on TwitterTweet
Share via EmailEmail
KEY POINTS
Dating opportunities for heterosexual men are diminishing as relationship standards rise.
Men represent approximately 62% of dating app users, lowering their chances for matches.
Men need to address skills deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations.
Nathan Cowley/Pexels
Source: Nathan Cowley/Pexels
Younger and middle-aged men are the loneliest they’ve ever been in generations, and it’s probably going to get worse.
This is not my typical rosy view of relationships but a reality nonetheless. Over the last 30 years, men have become a larger portion of that growing group of long-term single people. And while you don’t actually need to be in a relationship to be happy, men typically are happier and healthier when partnered.
Here are three broad trends in the relationship landscape that suggest heterosexual men are in for a rough road ahead:
Dating Apps. Whether you’re just starting to date or you’re recently divorced and dating again, dating apps are a huge driver of new romantic connections in the United States. The only problem is that upwards of 62% of users are men and many women are overwhelmed with how many options they have. Competition in online dating is fierce, and lucky in-person chance encounters with dreamy partners are rarer than ever.
Relationship Standards. With so many options, it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective. I do a live TikTok show (@abetterloveproject) and speak with hundreds of audience members every week; I hear recurring dating themes from women between the ages of 25 and 45: They prefer men who are emotionally available, good communicators, and share similar values.
Skills Deficits. For men, this means a relationship skills gap that, if not addressed, will likely lead to fewer dating opportunities, less patience for poor communication skills, and longer periods of being single. The problem for men is that emotional connection is the lifeblood of healthy, long-term love. Emotional connection requires all the skills that families are still not consistently teaching their young boys.
While there’s probably no chance of stemming the rising tide of unintentional single men, there is still good news.
The algorithms are becoming increasingly more complex on dating apps and other online platforms. One benefit is that great matches are on the rise. Hinge, one dating app, found through beta trials that 90% of users rated their first date positively, with 72% indicating wanting a second date.
How can men reap the benefit of the algorithms? Level up your mental health game. That means getting into some individual therapy to address your skills gap. It means valuing your own internal world and respecting your ideas enough to communicate them effectively. It means seeing intimacy, romance, and emotional connection as worthy of your time and effort.
Ultimately, we have an opportunity to revolutionize romantic relationships and establish new healthy norms starting with a first date. It’s likely that some of these romances will be transformative and healing, disrupting generational trauma, and establishing a fresh culture of admiration and validation.
Men have a key role in this transformation but only if they go all-in. It’s going to take that kind of commitment to themselves, to their own mental health, to the kind of love they want to generate in this world. Will we step up?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45003834) |
Date: August 12th, 2022 11:14 AM Author: Ruby yapping meetinghouse rigpig
lmfao jesus christ i started copying and pasting individual sentences to make fun of, but by the time i got to the end of the article i would have had to copy paste the whole thing
yeah buddy, if only regular men were more "emotionally available" (what?) they would start being more successful on dating apps when compared to chad
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45003843) |
Date: August 12th, 2022 11:35 AM Author: gaped abnormal stag film circlehead
lol I'm sure no woman mentioned her preference for height.
There's a numerical mismatch and an overwhelming preference for height. Shortmos are DONE HERE it's time to whoremonger. No amount of "working on yourself" or "skills" will make you taller. You cannot buy a woman's love but you can rent her affection, enjoy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45003962) |
|
Date: August 13th, 2022 1:51 AM Author: Misanthropic Appetizing Crackhouse
To be fair,
Except for Jews. This never even ends for them -- it just keeps going on, wonderfully, forever.
Or so all of the pumos (none of whom are Jewish and all of whom are way smarter, hotter, taller, funnier, richer, pretty much whatever they want more than me) keep telling me again and again!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45007728) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2022 12:09 PM Author: gaped abnormal stag film circlehead
This is pretty accurate and if you don't believe it make a fake tinder account as a chick. You'll have 500 guys chasing you before you can finish a profile. They have the incredible privilege of just waiting for men to compete for them, then decide which are worth their time to reciprocate. If they don't like the current crop, then they can put away the phone and come back in two days; 500 more men will be in the candidate pool. The only women on tinder for any length of time are either not looking to settle down at all or those that are insanely picky and have a list of requirements a dozen pages long.
The same technological revolution that made love easy for women has made it extremely challenging for men. Any time you're attracted to a woman, you're joining a candidate pool hundreds deep. Are you going to be better than all of them? Probably not.
Technology, a global imbalance between the number of men and women, and weakened expectations of monogamy have been a gift for women and a curse for men. Any analysis of dating that doesn't recognize that dynamic is woefully incomplete at best.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45004108) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2022 1:43 PM Author: Exhilarant stead mad-dog skullcap
"That might indeed mean dating down the socio-economic ladder but bfd, men do this all the time."
It matters a lot because the expectation ingrained in people, especially women, is that they will be able to give their children a life that's equal to or better than what they grew up with. Girls don't want to invest in a long-term relationship that, at best, will send them straight down the socio-economic totem pole. This is true everywhere. You even saw it in Japan well before the advent of dating apps. When opportunities for young men to climb and grow go down, then dating, sex, and birth rates go down.
It's a challenge for mature first-world economies.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45004581) |
Date: August 12th, 2022 1:23 PM Author: fuchsia sweet tailpipe cuckold
single men would rather blame "shrews", "chad", "height" or "canthal tilt" than admit that they really don't offer much.
a lot of men don't want a relationship at all; they just want to sexually conquer as many women as possible. that's all fine, but it's totally bitchmade to whine about sexual conquest being difficult.
among men who think they want a relationship, many are approaching it from a perspective of overwhelming entitlement. they want a beautiful, submissive woman to take care of the household, but they never once ask themselves what would motivate such a woman to do that. they simply don't care what women think about anything or want, which is also fine, but it shouldn't be surprising that such a perspective is unappealing to many women
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45004474) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2022 1:43 PM Author: pungent razzle cuck
Women are very short term in their thinking. They don't realize how quickly they depreciate.
This leads to very poor decisions, as those who were not good enough for them very soon end up out of their reach. This is the key in the mismatch.
Men are much more balanced in their self assessment.
Ultimately unmarried men imply the same number of unmarried women. That is not good for women, but are the choosers and they miscalculate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45004579)
|
Date: August 12th, 2022 1:57 PM Author: magical cerebral set
XO is stupid about apps. Apps ruin dating for both men and women, just for different reasons, but XO refuses to admit that women get utterly fucked too.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45004675)
|
Date: August 12th, 2022 8:46 PM Author: titillating patrolman
Part of the reason that only 38% of women are on the apps is because they don't really work for women either.
They get TOO MANY messages from too many guys. If you get 100 messages a week from different guys "interested" in you, you quickly realize none of those guys are actually interested in you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45006698) |
|
Date: August 13th, 2022 3:21 AM Author: Marvelous french chef chad
And yet these women literally voted for this with their feet by abandoning dating sites like okcupid for apps. There was a time when any woman could get numerous messages from guys genuinely "interested" in her just by signing up and writing a decent profile. Tons of messages from guys with similar interests, statistically measured for compatibility, genuinely interested in relationships.
But the brutal truth is that even when okcupid was in vogue, most women were too lazy to even write a profile that would allow anyone to actually be "interested" in them on anything other than a physical level. And when something came along that took even less effort than writing a bad okcupid profile, they quickly moved. And then even the women who had actually put in a reasonable amount of effort moved, because rather than finding someone compatible, they picked the lowest effort path to connect with Chad based on looks alone.
They're getting exactly what they voted for.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45007815) |
|
Date: August 13th, 2022 11:01 AM Author: gaped abnormal stag film circlehead
This is just a restatement of this being trivially easy for women and impossible for men.
The man you want is in there somewhere-- if you're getting 100 messages a week that is five thousand in a year (let's assume you take a couple weeks off to get a round number). Is every single one of them, 100% unsuitable? Of course not, unless your standards are insane (must be a tall astronaut). Literally all you have to do is read and decide which man you want and you can be done if you care to but, gosh darn it, selecting from all the men competing for your attention is too much work so fuck it. And that's not even considering what women can do if they actually take initiative, which most do not.
Meanwhile it doesn't matter what a man does-- women are so flooded with messages it won't be read anyway, so even the tall astronaut is screaming into the void. He won't get 5,000 matches in a lifetime, let alone the 5,000 a woman can get in a year merely by virtue of being a woman.
It's your prerogative to not even bother reading the messages of the suitors competing for your attention but then you've waived any right to complain about being single ever. The match for you is in there somewhere, you just don't have the time for him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45008454) |
Date: August 13th, 2022 11:51 AM Author: Lascivious doobsian trailer park
Its been posted above but I just want to reiterate for the thoughtful and balanced moderates like LTM who continue to insist that the major contributor here is male financial/emotional instability:
The first iteration of dating sites were OKC, Match, etc. Whichever platform women go on, men follow. Why did those early platforms, with much more detailed profiles, life questions, get replaced with Tinder? Why did women mass migrate to a platform that is almost exclusively picture driven?
The dumbass middle-ground types can't really explain that dynamic without implicitly agreeing that:
1. Women are the sexual selectors
2. Women have explicitly selected to exclusively have short-term flings with the top 10% of chad and ignore the other 90%
3. This happened outside of any context of a lack of male financial success (case-in-point: This trend was just as prevalent and growing in 2008 as it was in 2018, even though the economic situations were vastly different).
The thoughtful moderate take will still be to partially, or mostly, blame male attitudes and financial failures, but its a chicken/egg situation. Female mating decisions has driven men to bifurcate into either PnDers or incel losers. You can't then turn around and blame both those groups for the lack of good men to marry. Women were the ones who sowed the seeds.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45008649) |
|
Date: August 13th, 2022 11:30 PM Author: Lascivious doobsian trailer park
Lol I'm married my guy
There are plenty of things in the world that men are responsible for. Dating dynamics is just not one of them. Women drive the show, they are largely responsible for the outcome.
If most women decided to only look for men at McDonald's restaurants, you'd see the entire male population start eating Big Mac's daily
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45010896) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2022 6:54 AM Author: swollen pit shitlib
"The first iteration of dating sites were OKC, Match, etc. Whichever platform women go on, men follow. Why did those early platforms, with much more detailed profiles, life questions, get replaced with Tinder? Why did women mass migrate to a platform that is almost exclusively picture driven?"
I think you are ignoring some relevant facts here.
First, the switch from OkCupid-style dating sites to Tinder-style dating apps was probably more to do with the rise of smartphones than anything else. Remember that hilarious-but-kind-of-true thread about how women basically didn't go online before the iPhone: https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4396695&mc=126&forum_id=2
The Tinder swiping format is better suited for a smartphone screen than the OkCupid-style long profiles and questions are. I don't have the data to back it up or anything, but my sense is that apps like Tinder are way more popular than their OkCupid/Match predecessors ever were. Online dating used to be for weirdos, no?
Second, you seem to have a romanticized view of the earlier dating sites as being more "personality-oriented" based on the fact that they allowed longer profiles and lifestyle questions and so forth. But the truth is, those sites were just as shallow and looks-based as Tinder. This graph says it all:
https://psmag.com/.image/t_share/MTI3NTgyNDgxNjExMzAzNTU1/5.png
More discussion of OkCupid being thoroughly looks-based, including the experiment where they hid everyone's photos for a day and conversations stopped cold when the photos came back, data showing that profiles are rated the same with or without profile text, etc.:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160205013352/http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/we-experiment-on-human-beings/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5172124&forum_id=2#45011566) |
|
|