With the big outing feuds we've seen in the past this hasn't really done anything but get ppl's rancor up eg. TSINAH and benzo still poast just as much, they just hate each other more for it. No reason to think that if GayPumo gets outed by GJR or whoever it'll do anything to the flow of poasting besides make people more bitter and continue to stamp out what little fun and relief there is to be had here

It does kill the "community" a bit more each time but at this point with the absentee landlord stuff w/ Rach maybe it's for the best. In a year this place will look like a .onion illegal gore forum if things keep going the way they are

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278004)

in the de facto war-of-all-against-all we actually have? you can use the minimum necessary outing to defend yourself from an initiation of outing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278077)

I don't know previous monikers of GayPumo-- maybe he is a respected, good poaster, but I haven't seen it. His obsession with GJR, including trying to figure out her address, is creepy simp behavior.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278148)

But neither should TSINAH, Spaceport, RSF, or Benzo. The fact is that the mods are powerless beyond playing whack-a-mole. Some autist that gets ahold of your info can spam it with impunity and there's nothing anyone here can do about it unless they buy the domain from rach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278171)

He makes the rules, so my opinion doesn't matter, but I do agree with him on this point. Our community flourishes when its members are comfortable sharing details about themselves, and those who wish to gather and use this information maliciously should be punished.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278194)

No idea if Tubby is accurately reporting haven’t read any of the relevant threads

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45279759)

Independent obligation to the bort itself not to out, it's not a personal duty to the poaster.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278196)

However, this view of the One Rule is misguided. Under the One Rule of Autoadmit Poasting and relevant Canons of Megapoaster Conduct, poasting obligations are independent, not tit-for-tat in nature. In other words, each side has an independent obligation to protect information that is reasonably calculated to lead to outing, regardless of what information any other party has disclosed or withheld. This rule prevents unlimited escalation in the cost and duration of poasting feuds by forcing poasters to focus on maintaining strict adherence to the One Rule.

The independent nature of poaster obligations was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in its decision in Sewerskunk White Woman v. Peter North. In that case, the court held that documents which had been inadvertently produced by one party could not be used as a basis for outing by an opposing poaster. The court reasoned that "the bort is a creature of rach's law and...the One Rule imposes upon each side an affirmative duty not to disclose outing information." 10 Halford 9813489354 (2013). This rule applies even if (as in Sewerskunk) one party has already disclosed information on the bort.

The independent, not tit-for-tat, nature of One Rule obligations is essential to the fair and efficient functioning of our civil poasting system. It ensures that poasters focus on megapoasting only those materials that are necessary for autistic enjoyment, without engaging in unlimited escalation and crossing the real.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45278317)

self defense is not a good analogy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45279807)

Nobody's getting blown away by old facebook pics unfortunately

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5205439&forum_id=2#45281356)