Long read.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46397555)

I saw that other post about the new whistleblower.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46397685)

General Relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. In this theory, all objects in the universe move along paths determined by this curvature. There isn't a mechanism within General Relativity that allows for the cancellation or reversal of the curvature caused by a mass, which would be required for an "anti-gravity" effect.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398209)

And from ChatGPT's interpretation of those papers:

The question seems to center around the application of the CPT (Charge, Parity, Time) symmetry to general relativity, and its implications for antigravity.

CPT symmetry is a fundamental principle in quantum field theory, which states that the combined operations of charge conjugation (C), parity transformation (P), and time reversal (T) leave the laws of physics invariant.

The first paper you linked, "Is dark matter an illusion created by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum?," suggests that applying CPT symmetry to general relativity could predict the existence of antigravity. In other words, it argues that antimatter might not fall down in a gravitational field as regular matter does, but instead it might "fall up," or experience antigravity.

The second paper, "CPT symmetry and antimatter gravity in general relativity," seems to support this idea, suggesting that this repulsive gravitational interaction (antigravity) can be derived from general relativity without any modifications or new assumptions.

However, as of my knowledge cut-off in September 2021, these ideas were still very much in the realm of theoretical speculation. Direct experimental evidence for antimatter's gravitational behavior has not yet been obtained, although there have been ongoing efforts, such as the ALPHA experiment at CERN, to directly measure the gravitational acceleration of antimatter.

Moreover, the application of CPT symmetry to general relativity is a non-trivial issue due to the fact that gravity is inherently a theory about spacetime itself, while CPT symmetry comes from quantum field theories defined on flat (Minkowski) spacetimes. How to reconcile these different contexts is a key open question in theoretical physics, connected to the as-yet-unsolved problem of quantum gravity.

Finally, it's also worth noting that the existence of antigravity would have profound implications for cosmology and our understanding of the universe's structure and evolution, potentially providing new insight into phenomena such as dark energy and cosmic inflation. But until there's experimental evidence to support these ideas, they remain in the realm of theory.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398243)

Moreover, General Relativity is a classical theory, which does not involve quantum concepts like charge conjugation or CPT symmetry directly. The intersection of quantum mechanics and gravity is still an active area of research, with many questions unsolved as of 2021.

In summary, while CPT symmetry is a critical principle in quantum physics, it does not provide a mechanism for "anti-gravity" in the sense of negating or reversing gravitational forces. As of the last update in September 2021, no well-accepted physical theory or empirical evidence supports the existence of anti-gravity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398249)

The second paper literally proposes a theoretical framework that does not violate our current understanding of physics. It's not empirically proven, of course, but it also doesn't mean our current understanding of physics is incorrect. Instead, it implies that it's incomplete--as I initially said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398259)

The gravitational repulsion would prevent the mutual annihilation of isolated and alternated systems of matter and antimatter. The location of antimatter could be identified with the well-known large-scale (tens of Mpc) voids observed in the distribution of galaxy clusters and superclusters. Indeed, Piran [25] showed that these voids can originate from small negative fluctuations in the primordial density field, which (acting as if they have an effective negative gravitational mass) repel surrounding matter, and grow as the largest structures in the Universe. These new cosmological scenarios could eliminate the uncomfortable presence of an unidentified dark energy, and maybe also of cosmological dark matter, which, according to the \Lambda-CDM concordance model, would together represent more than the 95% of the Universe content."

Again, from a peer-reviewed & published journal article.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398272)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398279)

The concept of anti-gravity, as it is commonly understood, doesn't directly relate to CPT symmetry.

CPT (Charge, Parity, Time) symmetry is a principle in quantum field theory that states physical laws should remain the same if a particle is replaced with its antiparticle (C), spatial coordinates are reversed (P), and the direction of time is reversed (T). However, CPT symmetry is not associated with reversing or negating gravitational effects.

In general relativity, gravity is not a force but a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. There is no known mechanism within this theory to create an "anti-gravity" effect that negates or counteracts this curvature. If a mechanism to control or manipulate gravity were discovered, it could require new physics beyond the Standard Model and general relativity as understood up until 2021.

It's also worth mentioning that gravity and its interplay with quantum mechanics is not fully understood. The unification of quantum mechanics and gravity, often referred to as quantum gravity, remains an open problem in theoretical physics.

In conclusion, as of my training data up to 2021, the concept of "anti-gravity" as a way to counteract or control gravity isn't supported by existing physical theories, including general relativity and quantum field theory (where the concept of CPT symmetry comes from). However, science is always advancing, and our understanding of the universe continues to evolve over time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398294)

Please consider reviewing WP:GOALPOSTS as well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398302)

As of my training cut-off in September 2021, there is no known way to "violate" or "negate" gravity in a manner that would allow an object (like a UFO) to levitate or move without apparent propulsion, at least according to our current understanding of physics. That is what is often referred to as "anti-gravity".

CPT (Charge, Parity, Time) symmetry is a principle in quantum field theory. It states that the laws of physics remain unchanged if a system is subjected to three transformations: charge conjugation (changing particles into their antiparticles), parity transformation (reflecting the system in a mirror), and time reversal (reversing the direction of time). As important as CPT symmetry is in quantum physics, it doesn't provide a mechanism for creating "anti-gravity" effects.

This is because gravity as we understand it through Einstein's General Relativity is a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime in the presence of mass and energy. As of 2021, we have no established theories or models in physics that allow us to manipulate this curvature in a way that would create an anti-gravity effect.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398308)

Immense distances: Even in our own Milky Way galaxy, the distances between stars are vast. The nearest star system to Earth, Proxima Centauri, is about 4.24 light-years away. If you were to travel to Proxima Centauri at the speed of the fastest spacecraft ever launched by humans (the Parker Solar Probe, which can reach speeds of about 430,000 mph), it would take approximately 6,700 years. Intergalactic distances are even more vast, with the Andromeda galaxy, the closest spiral galaxy to the Milky Way, being about 2.5 million light-years away.

Energy requirements: The energy required to accelerate a spacecraft to a significant fraction of the speed of light (necessary to make intergalactic travel feasible within a reasonable time frame) is enormous. We currently don't possess the technology or resources to achieve this.

Time scales: Even if a civilization could build a spacecraft that traveled at near the speed of light, intergalactic travel would take hundreds of thousands to millions of years from the perspective of observers on Earth, due to the vast distances involved.

Survivability: There are also significant challenges in terms of survivability for biological organisms over these time scales and distances. Hazards include cosmic radiation, micro-meteor impacts, and the requirement for life-support systems.

One potential theoretical workaround for these issues is the concept of a wormhole, a shortcut through spacetime. However, as of 2021, wormholes are purely theoretical, with no empirical evidence to suggest they exist, and significant doubts as to whether they could be stable or large enough to allow for the passage of a spacecraft.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398263)

Nothing you've offered conclusively disproves anything I've written.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398278)

You are an idiot trying to sound smart via chatGPT, and both of these traits of yours can be explained by your brain saturation with cum.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46400183)

(1) It has a specialized calcified "club" that can strike with great speed and power. It can accelerate up to 10,000 times the force of gravity and reach speeds of 75 fps from a standing start. The impact force exerted by the mantis shrimp's club is equivalent to the shot of a .22 caliber bullet.

(2) The power behind the mantis shrimp's punch is due to its unique spring-like mechanism. The energy for the punch is built up and stored in a structure called a saddle (due to its shape), which is made of a very resilient type of biological material. The shrimp locks this spring in place using a latch until it's ready to strike. When the latch releases, the energy is transferred almost instantly to the club, creating the high-speed punch.

(3) The club of a mantis shrimp is designed to withstand the extreme forces it generates. It's composed of a highly mineralized outer layer (which is shock-resistant), a middle layer that is structured to absorb and dissipate energy, and a flexible inner layer that prevents fractures.

(4) Mantis shrimp have one of the most complex visual systems ever discovered. They have 16 types of photoreceptor cells for color analysis (compared to humans, who have only three). Some species can see ultraviolet light, and their eyes are thought to be highly sensitive to polarized light. Each eye is divided into three parts, allowing the mantis shrimp to see objects with three different parts of the same eye. In other words, each eye has "trinocular vision" and can gauge depth and distance on its own.

(5) Mantis shrimps can detect subtle water movements through sensory organs located on their appendages. This ability helps them detect prey, avoid predators, and communicate with one another.

They are also found at depths of up to 4,000 feet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398749)

They're just one of the many bizarre creatures inhabiting the ocean depths. Would it surprise you if there's some super advanced alien race playing Dr. Mengele with sea creatures?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46398787)

Caller: There’s like an 8-foot person beside it and another one is inside us and it has big eyes and it’s looking at us — and it’s still there,” the caller told a dispatcher.

Dispatcher: OK, where is this on your property?

Caller: In my backyard. I swear to God this is not a joke, this is actually — we’re terrified.

Dispatcher: So, there’s two people, there’s two subjects in your backyard?

Caller: Correct and they’re very large. They’re like 8 foot, 9 feet, 10 foot. They look like aliens to us. Big eyes. They have big eyes. Like, I can’t explain it, and big mouth. They’re shiny eyes and they’re human. They’re 100% not human.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46402540)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5351583&forum_id=2#46405834)