If few out of the many spurred on by the sinister calculations of hyperstimulating media depictions of carnality are willing to say "no", there's no bottom on the usual dynamic of "I have to do this/not do this to get this quality of man" that determined pro-social assortive mating in past eras. The self-destructive and myopic aggression of the market driven culture in the West that infects even dating norms prizes virginity as a *commodity* (nasty) but not as a *quality* with an intrinsic and not exactly transparent at first glance (it's spiritual; pneumatic) importance of its own

We may complain about the sexlessness of Zoomers now but it seems to me to be a mass unconscious reaction to a fundamentally untenable crisis of intangible and distinctly irrational "value" in the incentives that determine the viability of long-term pair bonding. Destroy constancy and the foundational value in an individual pair's partnership, separated and individuated from the mass, and you destroy one of the pillars of the household's ability to affect social change and resist outside pressures. It is not an accident of nature that this is the state of things

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081167)

I'm saying contemporary media and (((those))) who design, plan, and inflict it on the public are using it as a sharp wedge to destroy the strength of the traditional family unit for the purposes of mass social disintegration and race-to-the-bottom atomization. The burden, as always, lies on men to affect change by re-learning sexual discipline

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081173)

The males of this particular tribe have a well-documented psychological obsession with defloration that likely comes from an ugly, squalorous culture attached to all sorts of genetic deformities (read: curses) that never allows them to flower at all. Imagine actually feeling envy to the point of hatred, even for a those of a culture that allows them to flourish materially, then imagine being Jewish. They're one and the same

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081184)

and we also definitely needed a trillionth iteration of this thread for sure. BUT NYUUG is "repetitive"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081174)

it's all basically a compact among men to organize society for equitable pussy access. women have no agency in any of it. they are a passive commodity, a 'prize'.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081217)

*invents feminazism*

*pens bizarre screeds wrt downfall of western social contract ad naseaum on racist lawboardt*

*same cumskin fucktards ironically accuse alpha patriarchal asian men, the last stand against insane cumskin feminazism, of being "feminine"*

*is xoxo cumskin fucktard*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5447743&forum_id=2#47081219)