Date: October 15th, 2026 10:29 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I love how his quick journey from it being another tool of the central bankers to him subordinating his "calling" to it completely to it disproving his nonsense so he begins using it for esoteric masturbation.
This is basically Consuela in a nutshell and exactly how he behaves here.
Date: October 15th, 2026 10:37 PM Author: stirring haunted graveyard
I use AI to spellcheck/edit every single post I make, so I don't think that information is anywhere near dispositive. My typical process is (1) write a longform rough draft, (2) dialectical sparring with AI, (3) insert specific AI improvements for the argument. My last post was about 20% AI and the one before that 15% AI (per Pangram, which I pay for). The initial summary is AI and I use it for title suggestions too, so no pushback there. I also don't deny experimenting to find the right mix in the past, and have arguably overdone it at some point - that would be a fair criticism.
It's interesting seeing the creative ways you are using this novel technology, so I don't mind it. I think your interpretations have been fundamentally wrong, but I appreciate you pushing things into new directions.
Date: October 15th, 2026 10:40 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I love that you throw in some faux magnanimousness in as you call me wrong over and over (I get it!), this time in response to an AI generating a report about your substacks where I'm not even making an assertion.
Date: October 15th, 2026 10:41 PM Author: stirring haunted graveyard
the assertion is implied, and it's clear what you're doing: trying to come up with new ways to undermine my credibility using AI because you don't like me. that's fine, whatever you come up with will either stick or it won't, and my pushback was indeed paired with "faux magnanimity" because it is interesting to see. but it also reinforces to me the idea of "hinge propositions", because you and i (and i and goy superstar) don't see to have much commonality no matter how much we type to each other
Date: October 15th, 2026 10:45 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I had a hypothesis and tested it using a neutral method. This process probably seems backwards to someone that starts with certainty and works backwards to find evidence confirming it.
Date: October 15th, 2026 10:49 PM Author: stirring haunted graveyard
my whole substack is about how ego certainty is *undermined* through lived life, and how one must navigate in light of that. your response here just reiterates my statement about how radically different our hinge propositions are (where yours are to rely on false establishment authority to reinforce your worldview, smuggled through pseudo-neutral AI prompts).
Date: October 15th, 2026 11:01 PM Author: stirring haunted graveyard
I understand you're part of gunnerattt's mud creature coterie, what lawman8 used to refer to as "group 2", with an ever-shifting moniker change, so you do you, champ.
Date: October 15th, 2026 11:15 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
It's not "pseudo-neutral", I asked it to analyze whether you use AI, I didn't prompt it to make a case for it.
Of course you know this because you know what it concluded is true. That's why you attack the method (despite not even knowing the prompt) rather than the substance.
"You will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: 'I've been found out'."
Date: October 16th, 2026 1:03 AM Author: beady-eyed nibblets
He's just a midwit with delusions of grandeur. Many such cases in these parts. His only notable feature is that he's particularly verbose and uses big words in nonsensical ways and presents it as fact.