Correct.

Now the REAL question is, who owns the media???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5165209&forum_id=2#44947969)

In fairness, this is all a totally new phenomenon -- no one could have seen this coming, it blindsided everyone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lying_press

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5165209&forum_id=2#44948002)

--------------------------

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent. of the nation—that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be admitted. Then I began to examine my favourite 'World Press', with that fact before my mind.

The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became still more repellent and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more falsehood than truth. The writers were—Jews.

Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which I had formerly looked at in a different light.

I saw the Liberal policy of that Press in another light. Its dignified tone in replying to the attacks of its adversaries and its dead silence in other cases now became clear to me as part of a cunning and despicable way of deceiving the readers. Its brilliant theatrical criticisms always praised the Jewish authors and its adverse, criticism was reserved exclusively for the Germans.

The light pin-pricks against William II showed the persistency of its policy, just as did its systematic commendation of French culture and civilization. The subject matter of the feuilletons was trivial and often pornographic. The language of this Press as a whole had the accent of a foreign people. The general tone was openly derogatory to the Germans and this must have been definitely intentional.

What were the interests that urged the Vienna Press to adopt such a policy? Or did they do so merely by chance? In attempting to find an answer to those questions I gradually became more and more dubious.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5165209&forum_id=2#44970794)

perhaps a final one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5165209&forum_id=2#44949565)

YOU'D HAVE ME TELL NO LIES

YOU'RE ALWAYS ASKING WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT

DON'T LISTEN TO MY REPLIES

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5165209&forum_id=2#44970980)