Date: August 12th, 2026 12:59 PM Author: Metaphysics Is Solved
Is this an intermediate phase of development wherein an individual attempts to obtain impossible mastery of the world through the intellect, and gets stuck because the whole enterprise is misguided?
Date: August 12th, 2026 1:46 PM Author: the White jensen huang
Yup. They become self-identifying with computers (intellect detached from physical form) because they perceive it as a frame of reality in which they have a "comparative advantage" due to the gap between their capability for abstract thought and the desirability of their phenotype
Date: August 12th, 2026 1:49 PM Author: Metaphysics Is Solved
Yes but as I stated on x dot Com there is an escape velocity where power, intellect and network outpace pure phenotype. It doesn't matter your normative stance on this fact. They are winning and evolutionary theory predicts this.
Date: August 12th, 2026 1:57 PM Author: the White jensen huang
Yeah I agree and don't dispute that at all. Why do you think I antagonize technocapital and its adherents/apologists (computer-people) so much? Because they are such a serious and powerful existential threat to human beings
Just because one mode or form of existence is more evolutionarily competitive does not make it "morally" superior or even inevitable. This kind of thinking, which the above people always use to justify themselves, is a kind of retarded, self-cuckolding "might makes right" fallacy. I hold the human animal to be morally superior because I am a human animal and I like myself and the other humans who are like me. It's not any more complicated than that
Date: August 12th, 2026 2:25 PM Author: Metaphysics Is Solved
Evolution is indifferent to modes of adaptation. If the Phenotype Class can't beat the Computer Identififers, then either (1) this is generally true across all possible scenarios, or (2) it is probabilistically most likely, or (3) it is unlikely, but we live in an unlikely scenario.
It could be highly dependent on initial conditions. But again if the Computer Identifiers are winning and there is no credible challenger, im not following the arguement.
Date: August 12th, 2026 2:35 PM Author: the White jensen huang
The computers only win if AI becomes runaway super intelligent and super powerful and becomes completely dominant over "the light cone" (hate this gay term btw). Otherwise we (human animals) will just keep doing our thing after this civilization falls and the cycle begins again. Like the rise and fall of every other past human civilization/mode of existence
This is why AI is so bad and so threatening. Because it can actually end things for us for real, permanently
Date: August 12th, 2026 2:43 PM Author: Metaphysics Is Solved
Those are just technical optimization problems unless you genuinely believe the nature of technology is suicide of the species (not just your perferred form of life).
That's a reasonable arguement (i.e., there are reasons for it), but its too tangled with a possible future where people in charge of AI actually support the continuation of the species and make the right decisions to keep humans alive.
Again this is different from the future you may prefer, but a K shaped future (where Computer Identifiers win) is consistent with the continuation of the species and the thesis that technology is not inherently suicidal.
Date: August 12th, 2026 2:49 PM Author: the White jensen huang
I see no reason to believe that artificial superintelligence, selected for by competitive pressures, with no relation whatsoever to biology, would somehow be aligned with keeping the human animal alive and free and thriving
Virtually everyone else who is "into" thinking and discussing this sort of thing agrees with me fwiw. Even most of the computer people themselves, who are under some kind of delusion that "we" are going to magically "merge" with the computers or literally "become" computers (this is obviously impossible, and another symptom of thinking that human "consciousness" is somehow separate from our physical form. Mind body dualism has been a disaster for white people and for the human species)
It’s the default when you look around and find yourself in college.
You’re from either a rich family (where either it doesn’t matter what you study, or you actually qualify to be a Man of Letters) or an unsophisticated poor family (that doesn’t know enough to push you to STEM).