Date: September 17th, 2026 2:01 PM Author: Richard Ames
Didn't watch with volume, but I would fuck her based on appearance. Of course, this bitch should be cooking a man breakfast, not running for governor. Fucking LMAO.
Date: September 17th, 2026 1:36 PM Author: pontificating talented foreskin
i heard a good conspiracy theory from texpol insiders that all this good news for dems is just fake bs designed to drive money to the campaign industry. they all know dems are going to lose but they want to drive as much donation money as possible into their pockets so they generate hype. which i guess is true of any state's campaign industry, but there's an extra level of dishonesty about it in texas because r's are so dominant.
Date: September 17th, 2026 1:47 PM Author: tantric stag film
R's arent so fking dominate, pretty sure if u look at every major race over last 20 years the GOP share has declined and declined, cruz only one last time by 3.5
actually nevermind fma
Early polling showed Cruz as a clear favorite, but polls closer to the election showed a closer race. Cruz ultimately outperformed polling and expectations and won re-election by 8.49%, improving on his 2018 margin by six points and flipping thirteen counties
Date: September 17th, 2026 1:48 PM Author: Richard Ames
I have poasted about this before and have been told this by more than one person who works in the political media and campaign space. It is pretty egregious.
It is also very effective to do in Texas because the size of the state allows for a lot of national attention. So much more money to be harvested than in a state like Montana or some shit.
Trump wouldn't have held his little convention in texas and he wouldn't be throwing money from his PAC's at the texas race if this were true. Cruz edged out Beto in 2018 and he was in much better polling shape than Paxton is now. The RCP average and the betting markets are very good barometers of where a race is.