UM Arb Q for Cali-mos
| Cerebral Mood | 05/25/23 | | Blathering 180 Meetinghouse | 05/25/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/25/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/26/23 | | Lake water buffalo business firm | 05/26/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/26/23 | | Lake water buffalo business firm | 05/26/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/26/23 | | Bull headed orchid new version | 05/26/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/26/23 | | Bull headed orchid new version | 05/26/23 | | Cerebral Mood | 05/26/23 | | pearl crawly menage | 05/26/23 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 25th, 2023 7:30 PM Author: Cerebral Mood
Client demanded UM arb. After written discovery and client depo, UM insurance co denied coverage and demanded appointment of arbitrator (instead of settling).
An arbitrator was appointed. After we had a date certain, the UM insurance counsel just demanded that the arb be canceled because they are denying coverage. Odd case.
Wwyd
Seems like the CR filing a UCL/bad faith/breach of contract suit in our Illustrious Superior Court instead of keeping arb on
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5345932&forum_id=2#46355763) |
 |
Date: May 26th, 2023 9:36 AM Author: Cerebral Mood
Client hit a trashcan that was left in the middle of the 101 by an unknown vehicle/trick. Insurance co is citing case law saying if you hit and dinette set without seeing where it came from, then there is no coverage.
I found case law where a rock bounces off a car and hits the vehicle, then there is coverage (either under UM statute or policy). They then canceled arb bc no coverage. Odd case.
I think I'm just going to file bad faith
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5345932&forum_id=2#46357408) |
|
|