My favorite attempts to Solve epistemology were always the Engineering, champ attempts like baysean reliabilism. But then you run into the Normativity problem.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5920508&forum_id=2#50244208)

Consider a hypothetical case. A historian establishes that an eclipse occurred on a particular date through independent contemporary records. An astronomer establishes the same proposition through a reconstruction of celestial motions. Assume that each investigation is sufficiently sound.

We have different evidence, different techniques, and different characteristic errors. Nevertheless, both investigators appear to know the same fact. The methodological differences alone give us little reason to conclude that their knowledge has fundamentally different natures.

A general account could say that both beliefs stand in an appropriate relationship to the truth, while explaining why that relationship is realized differently in the two investigations.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5920508&forum_id=2#50244224)