Date: March 6th, 2015 3:19 PM Author: flushed laser beams
stupid political views don't make him stupid. If you read enough of his posts, you can tell he's smart. You on the other hand? Terrible writer, boring mind. Sorry, sugar tits
LOL I guarantee I have about twenty IQ points on you at least. You've only made a couple of posts ITT and I am already considering adding you to my list. :))))
Our grad degrees are a wash and I beat you on UG, which is more important when it comes to social prestige anyway ("Ivy BS= Cornell or Penn and you didn't even try to dispute this) so I beat you.
Date: March 6th, 2015 7:18 PM Author: flushed laser beams
Out grad degrees are not a wash since yours is in law. Mine is by far more impressive and rigorous, and it's far more selective. And you haven't mentioned my undergrad.
You have FAILED to prove your initial claim of 20 pts higher IQ (most people from our convo would guess mine is higher) and are hereby sentenced to pwnage.
You tried to argue that your grad education is more prestigious than mine simply on the basis of it being a "T5 STEM" degree and mine being HYS law, idiot. Do you understand what an inference is?
This is why I got a 175+ and you're an Asian STEM robot who can't read and write English properly.
Date: March 8th, 2015 7:11 PM Author: flushed laser beams
Just because my grad degree is more prestigious than yours doesn't mean that I think every stem phd is smarter than every hys grad. That's what you claimed I was arguing since you're low iq and don't know how to argue carefully.
(Edit: either that or you were arguing that NO bio phd was smarter than any HYS grad, which is equally dumb)
I've owned the shit out of you in every exchange here. Lmao
Since you're quite obviously an Asian male and I'm white, I'll take your last bit as evidence of your self-loathing
You announced that you have an Ivy BS and T5 STEM PhD (It is known that I'm HYP-->HYS) and said something like "I'll let the board decide who's more prestigious."
Then I said our grad-level prestige is a wash and you said it's not because you're STEM and I'm in law. This is obviously meant to say that STEM is categorically superior to law, so don't try to backtrack now. "Our degrees are not a wash since yours in law."
Additionally, all that is known is that you're T5 STEM and I'm HYS. You DON'T KNOW which HYS school I went to, so you can only reach this conclusion if your T5 school is more prestigious than ANY HYS school (including Yale).
Of course, the rest of the board (and I) don't even know which T5 YOU supposedly attended so we could only share in your conclusion that you're more prestigious to me if it's the case that all of T5 (meaning the weakest member of the T5) is better than any member of HYS (including the strongest, most prestigious member).
YOU MUST UNDERSTAND my last paragraph, it's clear as day. If it isn't being one of those FOB science/tech "geniuses" who can't understand
Date: March 8th, 2015 8:21 PM Author: flushed laser beams
Yawn, this is unbelievably tedious. it's kind like sparring with a little child. I can't help myself own you though
Yes, I'm saying T5 stem phd is more prestigious than HYS law. This is an assessment on the average intelligence of the students in these programs. Many people agree with me.
I don't think I'm smarter than every lolyer at these schools, but I think the average member of my cohort is smarter than the average member of the school you pretend to have attended.
You've made several claims on which you were owned, now you're makin shit up to save face. Sorry, Asian "male", but you're done here
At least you're finally admitting that you're wrong, in your own way, at leas. LOL
You could have just said "Yes I made the stupid claim that a T5 degree is categorically more prestigious than an HYS degree is" without even knowing the individual schools we were comparing. It would have saved me several posts of trying to explain the English mind to some Asian freak who thinks he's better than a truly prestigious person because he went to Cornell and his Chinese parents made him do a lot of math when he was young.
This is besides the fact that you're wrong, and many people (particular Americans who aren't of Asian or Indian descent) would consider a YLS degree more prestigious than some random bio degree.
Date: March 7th, 2015 8:42 PM Author: flushed laser beams
Lol, nice backtracking. We weren't talking who will make more money or what the public thinks is cool. We're talking about who is smarter. And on an objective level, we can at the very least assert that lawyers who went to HYP aren't smarter than PhDs who graduated at the equivalent.
Also, your original claim was that your Iq is 20 pts higher than mine. Still waiting on that proof, Alia
The more we discuss this, the more it's obvious that you're lying about where you went to school, making me even more confident I'm smarter.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:26 PM Author: contagious hospital tank
he probably just doesn't put much effort into being critical of HBD stuff, because he already believes it and he doesn't think it's a deserving use of his attention.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:36 PM Author: contagious hospital tank
he reads a lot of shit exploring the HBD concept from various angles, but he doesn't do much of the "playing devil's advocate" or "challenging one's own beliefs" thing. whatever he gets out of reading that stuff apparently makes it worthy of his attention, even if challenging it isn't. he's probably more of a critical thinker on subjects he's more dispassionate about and can be more objective about.
the problem is he takes his silly blog echo chamber so seriously and doesn't try to reconcile that stuff with common sense. common sense might grant us that black people really do have lower IQs and that it's reasonable to think there could be a genetic connection, but fucklaw's screeds go way beyond that -- he had a couple of threads where he was arguing that adversarial racism against black people is morally justified and necessary. that's the kind of thing that needs a reality check.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:26 PM Author: flushed laser beams
this isn't inconsistent with "fucklaw makes retarded arguments, he's still smarter than you". maybe saying he is pretty smart is a stretch, I don't know what standards we're using. I'll stand by my original claim that he's smarter than shrewmo
when have we ever seen shrewmo make a deep or innovative argument?
How can you possibly argue that someone who makes dumb, shitty arguments is stupider than someone who doesn't make deep, innovative arguments, yet also doesn't make stupid arguments? JFC
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:46 PM Author: flushed laser beams
lol. because you stick to dumb topics, and even then you manage to throw up clunkers like this one. fucklaw tries his hand at grown up topics but fails.
literally have never seen you make an intelligent post about a single thing
Fucklaw is smarter because he makes stupid posts about "serious" topics and I come to xoxo to fuck around in my spare time and choose not to post about serious topics at all.
LOL you're going on the list. AND you're aspie as fuck. Topics about relationships and real life are "dumb", you shut-in Asian science dork
Date: March 7th, 2015 9:33 PM Author: flushed laser beams
I was providing an explanation for why someone who makes dumb, shitty arguments on complicated topics (psychometrics) may still be smarter than someone who makes bland posts about catty board drama. I didn't say it was proof, just that it isn't ruled out, which was basically what you were asking.
You follow, shrewmo? :)
These exchanges are good evidence that you're not too smart
No it was not not "basically" what I was asking, which you would understand if you have a better grasp of our language.
I initially thought you were stupid but are having to spend five posts explaining the implications of your HYS vs. STEM degree argument I think maybe you're just another science fob who doesn't understand the language well, and as such you don't express yourself well. I mean, you probably aren't stupid, your thoughts just get mangled as you're trying to change them from Mandarin or Korean or whatever to English. :(
Date: March 8th, 2015 8:22 PM Author: flushed laser beams
Sorry shrewmo, but my post was a correct explanation for "How can you possibly argue that someone who makes dumb, shitty arguments is stupider than someone who doesn't make deep, innovative arguments, yet also doesn't make stupid arguments?"
If you'd like to explain how that doesn't answer your question, feel free to do so.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:55 PM Author: contagious hospital tank
I've never seen her try to explain anything subtle or nuanced. she always sticks to common tropes that the reader already knows, or at most a really simple and narrow "connect the dots" type of argument that anyone can follow.
Date: March 6th, 2015 4:00 PM Author: flushed laser beams
of course. the idea that the smartest person in the room just happens to be an SPS writer + never says anything remotely interesting after TEN YEARS of posting and thousands of posts is hilarious.
Of course he's stupid. Which makes me unable to take the people who's saying he isn't seriously.
*waits for idiot pumo to RUN here and make some stupid, backtracking argument about how he never tried to say fucklaw *wasn't* stupid! he just_______..."
and ironside is smart, logical and well-reasoned. i've never seen any ironside hate on this boart other than in a playful locker room way on sports threads. why are xo drama queens creating drama with level-headed poasters?
btw, fuckbuddy's friend wants to have a 3 some with us (fuckbuddy is down, too, but doesnt think i'd be into it). her friend is fat/gross, and her thing is getting fucked in the ass by married men, and she's had gonorrhea 2x. should i just let it do what it do, or say no? i have no desire to fuck this girl, other than for the novelty of the 3 some.
Date: March 6th, 2015 4:14 PM Author: Pea-brained public bath
i actually first read "us" as me and you.
yes you should do it for two reasons. first, you will look incredibly beta in front of your fb by turning down a 3some with another chick, especially since fb is into it. second, it's a threesome! you have to take those opportunities when you can get them.
why does she like to get fucked in the ass by married men?
i see your points. the STD risk is a non-issue to you? that's the bigger issue w this skank than that she's ugly/fat.
she has horrible self esteem, for one, and likes the power of being a homewrecker. i dont know for a fact, is it even possible that she WAS NOT sexually abused by her dad?
Date: March 6th, 2015 4:24 PM Author: Pea-brained public bath
would you wear a rubber?
if not, i'd go for the 3some with the STD risk, but that's me. i don't think gonorrhea is that big a deal, and odds are she doesn't have it now anyway.
i meant more the specificity of getting fucked in the ass by married men. maybe she likes the idea of giving married men something their wives likely aren't? does she ever screw up irl for the married guys, or does she just like knowing they're fucking her even though they're married?
idk enough about the sexual abuse angle to speculate.
you mean, i shouldn't wear a rubber and just let it do what it do?
i think it's kinda all of the above w the married guys. likes the attention and giving guys what they cant get. likes getting abused by older, fatherly guys. it's not just married men-- it's middle-aged married men. so there's definitely a daddy issue going on. it's also powerful guys, too, that turn her on. getting fucked in the ass by romney is her #1 dream in life.
Date: March 6th, 2015 4:31 PM Author: Pea-brained public bath
i meant the rubber should assuage some of your STD fears, but that even if you didn't want to wear the rubber (for obvious reasons) then i'd still do it if i were you.
i think this is something you look back on and kick yourself for not doing it.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:19 PM Author: contagious hospital tank
we really have no basis for saying fucklaw is smarter or dumber than OP. shrewmo runs dumb schtick intentionally, fucklaw runs dumb schtick unintentionally, and neither schtick tells us anything about the actual IQ of the person behind the schtick.
I also have no idea whether DBG is smart, though he once claimed to have studied differential equations in high school.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:26 PM Author: contagious hospital tank
yeah, I guess he's probably smart, but he's so aspie that his intelligence gets misdirected. it's easy for a smart person to seem dumb when they have some other lacking quality, when someone else could be 10 IQ points lower but way more on-the-ball.
Date: March 9th, 2015 2:33 AM Author: Tripping amethyst toilet seat kitty
Uh you have repeatedly said I'm an Asian man, now I'm not schtick (despite the fact that I claim to be a white female on here?) make up your mind, dummy.
Huh? DBG seems like a pretty sharp dude. I haven't interacted with the others enough to know anything about them, but none of them - in my limited experience - stand out to me as dumb.
You're just trying to say that I'm stupid because I constantly make fun of you for being dumb, something that many other posters have pointed out. Grow up.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:25 PM Author: big sickened locus karate
No, we think you're stupid because you cited xo threads others made as proof doodikoof is dumb. Meanwhile, there are 10x as many threads calling you stupid
1) Doodikoff doesn't actually think I'm dumb, he's just lashing out like a child because I always call him stupid.
2)You think I'm dumb because you're stupid yourself and stupid people come to stupid conclusions. LOL. I'll try to explain this to you. I don't think Doodikoff is stupid *because* other people call him stupid! I reached that conclusion independently. I use other people calling him stupid as evidence to back up my opinion which I have explained many times elsewhere. Please tell me you understand, this is becoming tiring.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:35 PM Author: cordovan razzle clown
why do you feel the need to insult people at all here? Most of the time I've seen, they've done nothing to you, yet you just come in and attack. LIke Ironside, for example. You seem insecure, because you get some sick pleasure out of riling people up, unprovoked.
I point out Ironside's stupidity primarily because he says such stupid things about women. I would probably ignore his stupidity if it were expressed in other ways.
I pick on you because I find you racist and don't like what you said in the slaveowner thread (you are stupid in addition. To being racist of course).
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:42 PM Author: cordovan razzle clown
please link to anything, anything that I have ever posted that is racist (other than a NOWAG joke or two). Or even describe anything I have ever posted that is racist in case you have trouble finding a thread. Thank you in advance.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:28 PM Author: cordovan razzle clown
listen, getting into spats about who is dumb or not is stupid, because most people come here to have fun and fuck around and are not trying to get into scholarship contests.
However, popularity is an easier metric here, and you are probably at the bottom of pretty much everyone's list. Mostly because you suck, you attack people all the time, you are mean as shit, you post about dumb shit, and you are an attention whore always trying to stir up shit (like this thread).
Just go away, there will be no threads about "where is Shrewmo, I miss him"
he mainly posts in his own threads using his hundreds of alts so he really doesnt understand the board culture. to his credit, he generates a lot of attention with his retardness, and errantly thinks he's part of that joke
I didn't just list people who I don't like. I don't like Chalmers, harrison, askav, Steez or Jaggers. Yet I wouldn't characterize them as stupid. I am nothing if not fair.
Date: March 6th, 2015 3:25 PM Author: gay coffee pot
Rudolph and Fucklaw are ok. I like Rudolph's bold, contrarian sports picks. It's hard to judge since most of these guys use pumo accounts and I like the spatial awareness to tell one pumo moniker from another.
Would any of the people asserting that I'm stupid give examples or explain why if you wish to be taken seriously? I can explain every entry on my list.
Date: March 6th, 2015 4:12 PM Author: cordovan razzle clown
it's possible. It's also possible that "he" was getting his shit pushed in so hard ITT that he wanted an out to regroup. Shrewmo loves the attention (look at the list of well known posters that he calls out in the OP, this was bound to be a high post count thread), honestly we should just ignore this psycho from now on. Contributes nothing to this board but hate.
he's not consistent about anything, one week he'll be sucking off "alphas" like earl, then the next he'll make diss threads about them because they're misogynist dorks.
he loves it, he measures his success at disruption by how many poasts he racks up, which is why half the posts in his thread will always be his pumo.
just stop responding to him and let him screed away. in fact it's pretty funny when he just writes rants into the ether. you know no one will bother to read that screed, but, he only needs a thread once
Date: March 7th, 2015 2:02 AM Author: harsh beady-eyed mediation mad cow disease
this, along with random pumos who spam random names (saltybabe is pradeesh gupta from bloomington, IN! or whatever), genuinely makes me wonder what in the ever living fuck is in the heads of some folks here. like what grown man sits down, strokes his cock, and thinks "heh, I'm really gonna stir the pot tonight with my femschtick. heh."