Date: January 11th, 2022 12:38 PM Author: Deep titillating stag film
Even a favorable ruling for the plaintiffs won’t change anything. The state of Michigan passed a constitutional amendment making AA illegal and the University of Michigan just found ways around it to get the same class composition they wanted anyway. a private institution like Harvard will have no trouble finding loopholes.
Date: January 11th, 2022 2:00 PM Author: cobalt marvelous water buffalo
This is a rush transcript of "Special Report with Bret Baier" on December 31, 2021. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
EMANUEL: Illegal immigration, inflation, Afghanistan, and more, all part of the first year of this Biden administration.
With that, let's bring in our panel, Bill McGurn, columnist for "The Wall Street Journal," Mollie Hemingway, senior editor at "The Federalist," Charles Lane, opinion writer for "The Washington Post." Welcome to all of you.
EMANUEL: All right, let's go around the horn and get a look at your predictions for next year.
MCGURN: Very quickly, I think the Supreme Court is going to grant cert to the case of Asian-American citizens suing Harvard for discrimination and finally rule that this kind of racial preferences is unwelcome and unconstitutional.
Meester Juan de Roberto say “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” but I am product of affirmative action. I am perfect affirmative action baby. (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting)
This is a great read. It’s really striking the way he explains how EVERY single race category (black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native American) is arbitrary inconsistent bullshit manipulated by libs.
Date: May 10th, 2022 12:08 AM Author: gay affirmative action
The Brandeis Center and the Silicon Valley Chinese Association show that the low "personality" scores given to Chinese are bullshit. (see the part starting at page 19)
Date: May 10th, 2022 4:57 PM Author: shimmering shivering sound barrier famous landscape painting
How does this not just prove Harvard admins committed perjury? There is no way that the personality rating (precisely inverse to all other applicant predictive factors) would have come out so perfectly counterbalanced without some institutional coordination. There were no emails or texts? No whistleblower?
Date: May 10th, 2022 6:37 PM Author: gay affirmative action
they knew EXACTLY what they were doing. and they checked the stats constantly -- daily iirc -- to land the airplane with perfect precision. if you read the Sander amicus brief you can see what he's saying about the Harvard admins and their sworn testimony.
and the Economists' brief does basically the same thing.