Date: February 21st, 2022 3:47 AM Author: Pumonymous
is it just me or does the poast that she screenshotted... smell fake somehow? it's too clean or something, i don't know, just lacks the ring of authenticity. it reads like a journalist attempting to construct an imitation of a typical xo poast. plus how the fuck did she find it so quickly, why can no one link to the poast, etc.
Date: February 21st, 2022 3:50 AM Author: adulterous nofapping plaza mental disorder
the listing of several specific colleagues' names, including ones who are not household names and would unlikely be known at the tip of the tongue by a rando LOLyer, is odd. and the closing pot shot at Taylor seems almost like a tangent and doesn't fit in with overall narrative: white men reporters good; POCs bad — oh, btw, Taylor Lorenz sucks!
Date: February 21st, 2022 3:53 AM Author: Pumonymous
no one here had ever discussed "taylor lorenz" before. she is too obscure for wikipedians to be able to narrow down her date of birth more precisely than an eight(?!)-year range.
well, she could have cropped out the link bc she doesn't want anyone to visit and see that she's remotely associated with this shitshow of a tweetbort. i say this bc this is what i do when i show ppl poasts lol
if she's an active lurker, it makes sense she'd have seen it right away.
it doesn't seem hyperbolic to me. (remember, xo is performance art.) and if she were able to imitate xo's voice THIS well, she'd have to be really deep in this.
HOWEVER, it is interesting that no one has been able to find the poast. has anyone made a serious attempt?
also, it is trivially easy to completely fabricate a poast by going into the browser dev tools and making changes.
Date: February 21st, 2022 4:11 AM Author: Dark Vigorous Senate
i saw this poast earlier today, it was in some thread about how NYT is finally gingerly admitting to some aspects of fraudvirus that have been obvious to any non-retard for nigh 2 years now.
edit: this is/was it, now edited down to just the "CR." timestamp is the same and the 180 analysis flows naturally from the poast it's replying to and the rest of the thread.
Date: February 21st, 2022 9:00 AM Author: underhanded claret legal warrant
It did strike me as oddly long, dense and strongly opinionated about oddly specific journalists at a specific publication which is not the norm for this board
Date: February 21st, 2022 9:49 AM Author: aromatic alpha brunch
if anyone here wanted to trash NYT scribblers, it would be kristof, dowd, friedman, douthat. the people in that post are absolutely nobodies. no one here knows they exist.
50% chance lorenz posted it herself, screencapped it, then blanked.