Date: July 21st, 2023 3:29 PM Author: bearded galvanic goyim
Yea this makes no sense. He’s acting like after a jury trial, which is the final decision, there’s another court that could review that decision and even overturn it.
Date: July 21st, 2023 4:22 PM Author: chestnut judgmental crotch
Is that how I typed it? Doesn’t sound like how I’d write it. Judgment reversed so that we win on 2(d) and should get our fees, but jury verdict still stands (for now)
How did you "win" on 2(d) when the district court still has to "consider whether costco and the wholesalers purchased 5 hour energy from Living Essentials within approximately the same period of time in light of the record" especially considering the shitty record the district ct. recounted re: 2(a)
Date: July 21st, 2023 4:37 PM Author: chestnut judgmental crotch
Well that’s not an obstacle. Take a look at Judge Gilman’s short dissent. And unfortunately my friend Judge Miller was mistaken in describing it as unexplained — I guess he didn’t see the paragraph of our briefing where the other side’s 30b6 explained the meaning of the columns and rows. Anyway we’ll get this cleared up
Date: July 21st, 2023 5:59 PM Author: chestnut judgmental crotch
Sucks for them, but they'll at least get 100s of $K in promotional payments going forward, unless the defendant cuts off the Costco spigot (which Costco won't allow).