Date: November 17th, 2024 10:40 AM Author: gunneratttt (gunneratttt)
a rational scientist wouldn't be mad that his hypothesis wasn't proven. all that means is the theory needs adjustment. if you're searching for truth, then being wrong shouldn't provoke an emotional reaction, because it's necessary to get to the truth.
him sperging out about this shit proof of what a farce "political science" is. 99.9% of political science professors believe kamala was a great candidate and deserved to win. this is like being an engineering professor and every bridge you've designed collapsed immediately.
Date: November 17th, 2024 10:38 AM Author: hyperventilating public bath jap
The liberal artists all seemed fine iirc like erudite liberal artists mixed with journeyman Gen Xers.
Academia and government get a lot of crap in general relative to private businesses, among them NEWS OUTLETS, but also everything that happens at any corporation that isn’t 100% strictly Engineering is bullshit and fake and basically a plot to fuck over customers and white male Loser employees imo
Date: November 17th, 2024 10:41 AM Author: Carmine crusty jew
i was a literature major at THE university of maryland. i did the honors program (wrote a thesis on joyce's ulysses lmao), but the regular classes were full of tards.
anyway, i took modern drama and the prof was a MASSIVE shitlib, like super marxist wackadoo nonsense and he'd preach it to us.
he was telling us one day that the patriarchy extends everywhere you see man, they even used to think that male frogs chose their mates and the SCIENCE later proved that it's the females.
this chick drama student raised her hand and said "okay, so what are you telling us here? there's a frog conspiracy?"
the class erupted in laughter and the prof said "NO. i am TRYING to TEACH YOU PEOPLE that the patriarchy controls everything" and he went off on her for a couple more minutes, but he ended with "the patriarchy controls everything" and the chick said "i see that, for example in this fucking class" and she got up and left. it was 180.
the professor was clearly a pseduointellectual shitlib faggot who was not comfortable with anyone questioning his retarded ass talking points. kinda like lichtman! oh and the guy made $45k in 1999.
Date: November 17th, 2024 10:53 AM Author: Carmine crusty jew
the chick was cute, could have been. was she there in the late 90s-2001? the major was pretty small so i knew most people.
UMD was pretty chill man. fucking HUGE. they had a spring concert every year (they still might) and in 1998 i went to it and saw RUN DMC, the roots and the junkyard gang or whatever (remember that we aint nothin but mammals song?)
i later represented UMD in labor matters. i had a great track record. I tried two cases before the state higher ed labor relations board and kicked the shit out of the union both times. they couldn't come with me when i left biglaw, bc they had a "contract" with my firm and couldn't move their work. huge bummer.
Date: November 17th, 2024 10:54 AM Author: Carmine crusty jew
nah even then it was a joke. my first real job out of college was as a copy editor for science journals and i made around 40k, and a retard could have done that job (and did).
Date: November 17th, 2024 2:08 PM Author: mind-boggling avocado chad candlestick maker
Imagine how stupid a sports analyst would be if he was like "the keys to the game are pass offense, pass defense, run offense, run defense, and kicking, and the team with the majoiry of these wins 9 out of 10 times in my prediction!"
and then being like "The 49ers will certainly beat the Chiefs because they have an edge in my opinion in 4 of the 7 categories"
and then the game goes to overtime and Mahomes throws a 97 yard TD, and then the analyst acting butt hurt like "the keys to the game did not fail me Patrick Mahomes failed me!"