\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

lawyers rate this bankruptcy plan to get rid of fraud claims

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilf...
180 bistre office
  03/24/25
I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notifie...
topaz outnumbered headpube school
  03/24/25
looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where t...
180 bistre office
  03/24/25
wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the e...
Chartreuse plaza
  03/24/25
yea i think this is right
180 bistre office
  03/24/25
Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's ...
Cerebral internal respiration dysfunction
  03/24/25
I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this...
Flesh zippy boiling water friendly grandma
  03/24/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 4:57 PM
Author: 180 bistre office

party A sues party B for fraud and alleges all kinds of wilful and intentional behavior on party B's part.

party B enters into a settlement agreement with party A to settle the claim.

party B breaches the settlement agreement by failing to pay amounts owed under it.

Party A now has a breach of contract claim against party B.

Party A gets a judgment against party B for the amount of the settlement.

Party B discharges the amount owed to Party A as part of a bankruptcy filing because its based on breach of contract, while Party B could not have done so to get rid of the intentional tort claim.

Is there a flaw in this analysis?

Do defendants do this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778172)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:02 PM
Author: topaz outnumbered headpube school

I have a client in Party A's position. We were never notified of the BK before the bar date, so i think we'll get out without being discharged. But if he notified us he probably would have been able to do that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778188)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:05 PM
Author: 180 bistre office

looks like theres a bunch of exceptions to discharge where the court is allowed to look at the claims a settlement agreement is settling before discharging a breach of K claim so it may not work after all

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778195)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:08 PM
Author: Chartreuse plaza

wouldn’t party a still have a tort claim but for the effectiveness of a valid release through which the payments were structured? and wouldn’t the validity of that release likely hinge upon party b’s performance of those payments?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778203)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:20 PM
Author: 180 bistre office

yea i think this is right

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778248)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 7:15 PM
Author: Cerebral internal respiration dysfunction

Depends on the language of the satisfaction agreement. It's fairly common to see that the release of the claim depends on actual performance (usually including payment).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778588)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2025 5:21 PM
Author: Flesh zippy boiling water friendly grandma

I dropped out of law school after 10 days but I believe this is hearsay OP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5699143&forum_id=2#48778255)