Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM Author: concupiscible pink cuckoldry
the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have.
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: concupiscible pink cuckoldry
also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.
the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether).
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM Author: cream cumskin area
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit
the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.
The result is a President who emerges with far greater
power than ever before. It is a power, however, that neither
the People, nor Congress, nor the Constitution bestowed
upon him. In granting the President this unbridled authority, the Court upends its precedent, misconstrues our history, and sheds any pretense of judicial modesty. I respectfully dissent.