\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Airdrop

Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell

big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule...
Pearly Feces Hairy Legs
  05/22/25
[taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.] is this sti...
Pearly Feces Hairy Legs
  05/22/25
...
Pearly Feces Hairy Legs
  12/08/25
Next up, 13th Amendment!
Poppy Magical Digit Ratio Philosopher-king
  12/09/25
...
Ruddy elastic band rehab
  12/09/25
Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are t...
Pearly Feces Hairy Legs
  12/09/25
the cons have the right position on this, but i think this i...
concupiscible pink cuckoldry
  12/09/25
also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think ja...
concupiscible pink cuckoldry
  12/09/25
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2071599665666035776 Hump...
Pearly Feces Hairy Legs
  06/29/26
sbarro wrote the dissent. here we go... https://www.supre...
cream cumskin area
  06/29/26
rofl she cites NO KINGS In holding otherwise, the Court g...
cream cumskin area
  06/29/26
somebody should've made soto sit down and diagram that first...
sable hilarious legal warrant
  06/29/26
...
cream cumskin area
  06/29/26
i love rehnquist now! Today’s majority, however, d...
cream cumskin area
  06/29/26
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of...
cream cumskin area
  06/29/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply

Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM
Author: Pearly Feces Hairy Legs

big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"

https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#48954985)



Reply

Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM
Author: Pearly Feces Hairy Legs

[taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]

is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#48955022)



Reply

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM
Author: Pearly Feces Hairy Legs



(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49495612)



Reply

Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM
Author: Poppy Magical Digit Ratio Philosopher-king

Next up, 13th Amendment!

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49495893)



Reply

Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM
Author: Ruddy elastic band rehab



(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496020)



Reply

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Pearly Feces Hairy Legs

Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.

https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496212)



Reply

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM
Author: concupiscible pink cuckoldry

the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496287)



Reply

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM
Author: concupiscible pink cuckoldry

also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.

the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether).

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496297)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 10:38 AM
Author: Pearly Feces Hairy Legs

https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2071599665666035776

Humphrey's is gone!

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968888)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 10:58 AM
Author: cream cumskin area

sbarro wrote the dissent. here we go...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968911)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 11:00 AM
Author: cream cumskin area

rofl she cites NO KINGS

In holding otherwise, the Court gives the President a power unknown even to the English Crown against

which the Founders revolted, elevating him above his oncecoequal branches by transforming a duty to take care that

the laws be faithfully executed into a license to act in defiance of those very laws. If nothing else, the doctrine of stare

decisis, which today’s decision cursorily dismisses, should

have made this a profoundly easy case under Humphrey’s

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968914)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM
Author: sable hilarious legal warrant

somebody should've made soto sit down and diagram that first sentence before she was allowed to put it in the opinion.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968921)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 11:05 AM
Author: cream cumskin area



(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968923)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 11:01 AM
Author: cream cumskin area

i love rehnquist now!

Today’s

majority, however, decides that it knows better: better than

members of the founding generation who created agencies,

like the Sinking Fund Commission and the Bank of the

United States, free from unfettered Presidential control;

better than a century and a half of Congresses and Presidents, starting with Grover Cleveland and continuing into

the 21st century, who created agencies in the FTC’s mold;

better than even Hamilton, Story, Webster, Holmes,

Brandeis, Frankfurter, and Rehnquist.

These great statesmen and Justices knew something that today’s majority apparently does not: that fealty to the Constitution means

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968915)



Reply

Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM
Author: cream cumskin area

Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit

the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.

The result is a President who emerges with far greater

power than ever before. It is a power, however, that neither

the People, nor Congress, nor the Constitution bestowed

upon him. In granting the President this unbridled authority, the Court upends its precedent, misconstrues our history, and sheds any pretense of judicial modesty. I respectfully dissent.

(https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49968920)