2 wrongs don't make a right. libs lose all moral high ground by sinking as low as the cons, and the republic is worse for it.
gavin is clearly trying to ape trump, which comes off super hollow when theyve been screeching at this exact behavior for 10 years
end of empire shit. nonody gives a fuck about the Majesty of the Law anymore. Even if dems say repubs started it, they're just as guilty for continuing. Republic a dying
this is 20 dem wrongs to 10 republican wrongs trying to make it 11 wrongs (i just made up these numbers, but assume with reasons that dems have done this way more already than cons)
correct. my argument is that a state should redistrict only when there's valid reason to do so, political vengeance not being one because of course your political opponents will do it back and suddenly there's no Rule of Law anymore
Like i said, country going in a shitter RN cons and libs alike
both sides openly gaming the US political system to get ahead of their opponents is not a good look at all and doesn't bode well for the Rule of Law. soon it won't Mean anything. used to be con's thing at least purpotedly and it's bad that there's no Rule of Law party now
Not sure this warrants a serious response. If you don't see why pulling the levers of govt to favor your party (redistricting to make permanent R or D districts) is bad, I'm not sure you understand the "America" thing
Date: August 27th, 2025 9:42 AM Author: soul-stirring abusive sound barrier stock car
lol brother nobody cares about this shit anymore. we've been in full on banana republic mode for at least 10 years now and realistically ever since 2008. it just takes a while to fall down the mountain
Agreed we live in Realpolitik world now and have for a while, but OP asked for an argument. Just thought I'd put the ol "moral" one out there and see how people react. The derision was entirely expected i assure you
Date: August 26th, 2025 5:05 PM Author: dashing flickering indian lodge mental disorder
Absolutely. Weird how no blue state like illinois, massachusetts, or every other blue state, never thought to gerrymander to increase democrat representation. I guess the only conclusion is that since republican states invented gerrymandering the blue states have no choice but to dabble in this dirty game. Im sure many blue states have a lot of seats to be gained by gerrymandering a la Texas's lead
Congrats Texas! Youve bitten off more than you can chew and now all the blue states are going to follow suit! Cons pwned again!
Date: August 26th, 2025 5:17 PM Author: jet associate
what’s wrong with CA gerrymandering even more though? Why should they be limited to matching what Texas and other red states do? What’s the argument against CA and NY going further with it than red states go?
Date: August 26th, 2025 5:59 PM Author: outnumbered laughsome potus hall
its not, they dont even have geerrymandering they have some faggy commision that does shit its supposd to be non partisan, u idiots are now arguing that if a party gets 40% of votes they shld get 40% of house seats, thats a novel proposition, apply that to OK, TX, FL etc too then u retards
Date: August 26th, 2025 11:43 PM Author: concupiscible gay wizard
But really can you explain what this gay back and forth between Texas and California is about. They are both complaining about/threatening to do something that you can find several examples of both sides already doing in spades.