(D) Thursday: Greed, then Harvest, then Limelight;
Friday: Limelight; Saturday: Greed
(E) Thursday: Greed, then Harvest; Friday:
Limelight, then Harvest; Saturday: Harvest
7. Which one of the following CANNOT be true?
(A) Harvest is the last film shown on each day of the
festival.
(B) Limelight is shown on each day of the festival.
(C) Greed is shown second on each day of the
festival.
(D) A different film is shown first on each day of the
festival.
(E) A different film is shown last on each day of the
festival.
8. If Limelight is never shown again during the festival
once Greed is shown, then which one of the following is
the maximum number of film showings that could occur
during the festival?
(A) three
(B) four
(C) five
(D) six
(E) seven
9. If Greed is shown exactly three times, Harvest is shown
exactly twice, and Limelight is shown exactly once, then
which one of the following must be true?
(A) All three films are shown on Thursday.
(B) Exactly two films are shown on Saturday.
(C) Limelight and Harvest are both shown on
Thursday.
(D) Greed is the only film shown on Saturday.
(E) Harvest and Greed are both shown on Friday.
10. If Limelight is shown exactly three times, Harvest is
shown exactly twice, and Greed is shown exactly once,
then which one of the following is a complete and
accurate list of the films that could be the first film
shown on Thursday?
(A) Harvest
(B) Limelight
(C) Greed, Harvest
(D) Greed, Limelight
(E) Greed, Harvest, Limelight
GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE.
Questions 11–17
A cruise line is scheduling seven week-long voyages for the
ship Freedom. Each voyage will occur in exactly one of the
first seven weeks of the season: weeks 1 through 7. Each
voyage will be to exactly one of four destinations:
Guadeloupe, Jamaica, Martinique, or Trinidad. Each
destination will be scheduled for at least one of the weeks. The
following conditions apply to Freedom’s schedule:
Jamaica will not be its destination in week 4.
Trinidad will be its destination in week 7.
Freedom will make exactly two voyages to Martinique,
and at least one voyage to Guadeloupe will occur in some
week between those two voyages.
Guadeloupe will be its destination in the week preceding
any voyage it makes to Jamaica.
No destination will be scheduled for consecutive weeks.
11. Which one of the following is an acceptable schedule of
destinations for Freedom, in order from week 1 through
week 7?
(A) Guadeloupe, Jamaica, Martinique, Trinidad,
Guadeloupe, Martinique, Trinidad
(B) Guadeloupe, Martinique, Trinidad, Martinique,
Guadeloupe, Jamaica, Trinidad
(C) Jamaica, Martinique, Guadeloupe, Martinique,
Guadeloupe, Jamaica, Trinidad
(D) Martinique, Trinidad, Guadeloupe, Jamaica,
Martinique, Guadeloupe, Trinidad
(E) Martinique, Trinidad, Guadeloupe, Trinidad,
Guadeloupe, Jamaica, Martinique
12. Which one of the following CANNOT be true about
Freedom’s schedule of voyages?
(A) Freedom makes a voyage to Trinidad in week 6.
(B) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 5.
(C) Freedom makes a voyage to Jamaica in week 6.
(D) Freedom makes a voyage to Jamaica in week 3.
(E) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in
week 3.
13. If Freedom makes a voyage to Trinidad in week 5,
which one of the following could be true?
(A) Freedom makes a voyage to Trinidad in week 1.
(B) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 2.
(C) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in
week 3.
(D) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 4.
(E) Freedom makes a voyage to Jamaica in week 6.
14. If Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in week 1
and a voyage to Jamaica in week 5, which one of the
following must be true?
(A) Freedom makes a voyage to Jamaica in week 2.
(B) Freedom makes a voyage to Trinidad in week 2.
(C) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 3.
(D) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in
week 6.
(E) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 6.
15. If Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in week 1
and to Trinidad in week 2, which one of the following
must be true?
(A) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 3.
(B) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 4.
(C) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in
week 5.
(D) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in
week 3.
(E) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe in
week 5.
16. If Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique in week 3,
which one of the following could be an accurate list of
Freedom’s destinations in week 4 and week 5,
respectively?
(A) Guadeloupe, Trinidad
(B) Jamaica, Guadeloupe
(C) Martinique, Trinidad
(D) Trinidad, Jamaica
(E) Trinidad, Martinique
17. Which one of the following must be true about
Freedom’s schedule of voyages?
(A) Freedom makes a voyage to Guadeloupe either in
week 1 or else in week 2.
(B) Freedom makes a voyage to Martinique either in
week 2 or else in week 3.
(C) Freedom makes at most two voyages to
Guadeloupe.
(D) Freedom makes at most two voyages to Jamaica.
(E) Freedom makes at most two voyages to Trinid
Questions 18–23
There are exactly three recycling centers in Rivertown:
Center 1, Center 2, and Center 3. Exactly five kinds of
material are recycled at these recycling centers: glass,
newsprint, plastic, tin, and wood. Each recycling center
recycles at least two but no more than three of these kinds of
material. The following conditions must hold:
Any recycling center that recycles wood also recycles
newsprint.
Every kind of material that Center 2 recycles is also
recycled at Center 1.
Only one of the recycling centers recycles plastic, and that
recycling center does not recycle glass.
18. Which one of the following could be an accurate account
of all the kinds of material recycled at each recycling
center in Rivertown?
(A) Center 1: newsprint, plastic, wood; Center 2:
newsprint, wood; Center 3: glass, tin, wood
(B) Center 1: glass, newsprint, tin; Center 2: glass,
newsprint, tin; Center 3: newsprint, plastic,
wood
(C) Center 1: glass, newsprint, wood; Center 2: glass,
newsprint, tin; Center 3: plastic, tin
(D) Center 1: glass, plastic, tin; Center 2: glass, tin;
Center 3: newsprint, wood
(E) Center 1: newsprint, plastic, wood; Center 2:
newsprint, plastic, wood; Center 3: glass,
newsprint, tin
19. Which one of the following is a complete and accurate
list of the recycling centers in Rivertown any one of
which could recycle plastic?
(A) Center 1 only
(B) Center 3 only
(C) Center 1, Center 2
(D) Center 1, Center 3
(E) Center 1, Center 2, Center 3
20. If Center 2 recycles three kinds of material, then which
one of the following kinds of material must Center 3
recycle?
(A) glass
(B) newsprint
(C) plastic
(D) tin
(E) wood
21. If each recycling center in Rivertown recycles exactly
three kinds of material, then which one of the following
could be true?
(A) Only Center 2 recycles glass.
(B) Only Center 3 recycles newsprint.
(C) Only Center 1 recycles plastic.
(D) Only Center 3 recycles tin.
(E) Only Center 1 recycles wood.
22. If Center 3 recycles glass, then which one of the
following kinds of material must Center 2 recycle?
(A) glass
(B) newsprint
(C) plastic
(D) tin
(E) wood
23. If Center 1 is the only recycling center that recycles
wood, then which one of the following could be a
complete and accurate list of the kinds of material that
one of the recycling centers recycles?
(A) plastic, tin
(B) newsprint, wood
(C) newsprint, tin
(D) glass, wood
(E) glass, tin
Answer key:
1. D
2. C
3. C
4. E
5. E
6. C
7. A
8. D
9. E
10. D
11. A
12. A
13. D
14. E
15. A
16. A
17. D
18. B
19. D
20. C
21. D
22. B
23. A
Here is the reasoning, compactly.
For questions 1–5, the only possible first two digits are 12 or 24, because the second digit must be exactly twice the first. The acceptable codes are:
12034
12043
12304
24013
24031
24103
So:
1. If the last digit is 1, the only code is 24031, so the fourth digit is 3. Wait: the listed answer choices do not include “fourth digit is 3.” Looking back at the answer choices, the only true listed condition for 24031 is “first digit is 2.” So the answer is A, not D.
Corrected Q1: A.
2. In every code, 2 appears before 3. Answer: C.
3. If the third digit is not 0, the possible codes are 12304 and 24103. In both, the fourth digit is 0. Answer: C.
4. Possible third/fourth pairs are 01, 03, 04, 10, 30. The impossible listed pair is 34. Answer: E.
5. In every code, there are at most two digits between 2 and 4. Answer: E.
Corrected first group:
1. A
2. C
3. C
4. E
5. E
For questions 6–10:
Thursday must end with Harvest. Friday must end with exactly one of Greed or Limelight. Saturday must end with exactly one of Greed or Harvest.
6. Only choice C works: Thursday H; Friday L; Saturday L then G. Answer: C.
7. Harvest cannot be last on every day, because Friday must end with Greed or Limelight. Answer: A.
8. If Limelight can never appear after Greed has appeared, put all possible Limelight showings before Greed. A six-showing schedule is possible, for example: Thursday L-H; Friday H-L; Saturday L-G. Seven is impossible because the Friday/Saturday restrictions cap the structure. Answer: D.
9. Counts are G = 3, H = 2, L = 1. Friday must contain both H and G, specifically H then G. Answer: E.
10. Counts are L = 3, H = 2, G = 1. Thursday can begin with Greed or Limelight, but not Harvest. Answer: D.
For questions 11–17:
Core rules: week 7 is Trinidad; week 4 is not Jamaica; exactly two Martinique voyages; at least one Guadeloupe between the two Martinique voyages; every Jamaica must be immediately preceded by Guadeloupe; no consecutive same destination.
11. Only A satisfies all rules: G J M T G M T. Answer: A.
12. Trinidad cannot be in week 6, because week 7 is already Trinidad and no destination can repeat consecutively. Answer: A.
13. If week 5 is Trinidad, one possible schedule is M G J M T G T, so week 4 could be Martinique. Answer: D.
14. If week 1 is Guadeloupe and week 5 is Jamaica, then week 4 must be Guadeloupe. The two Martinique voyages must be arranged around a Guadeloupe, forcing week 6 to be Martinique. Answer: E.
15. If week 1 is Guadeloupe and week 2 is Trinidad, the only possible schedule is G T M G J M T. So week 3 must be Martinique. Answer: A.
16. If week 3 is Martinique, week 4 and week 5 could be Guadeloupe, Trinidad. Example: G J M G T M T. Answer: A.
17. Because every Jamaica must be immediately preceded by Guadeloupe, and no consecutive destinations are allowed, Jamaica can occur at most twice in the seven-week schedule. Answer: D.
For questions 18–23:
Rules: each center recycles 2 or 3 materials; wood requires newsprint; Center 2’s materials are all also recycled by Center 1; exactly one center recycles plastic, and that center does not recycle glass.
18. Choice B works:
Center 1: glass, newsprint, tin
Center 2: glass, newsprint, tin
Center 3: newsprint, plastic, wood
Answer: B.
19. Plastic could be recycled by Center 1 or Center 3, but not Center 2. If Center 2 had plastic, Center 1 would also have plastic, violating the “only one center” rule. Answer: D.
20. If Center 2 recycles three materials, then Center 1 recycles those same three. Since all five materials must be recycled somewhere and plastic appears at exactly one center, Center 3 must recycle plastic. Answer: C.
21. If each center recycles exactly three materials, it could be true that only Center 3 recycles tin. One valid setup is:
Center 1: glass, newsprint, wood
Center 2: glass, newsprint, wood
Center 3: newsprint, plastic, tin
Answer: D.
22. If Center 3 recycles glass, then Center 3 cannot recycle plastic. So plastic must be at Center 1. Since Center 2 is a subset of Center 1 and every material must be covered, Center 2 must recycle newsprint. Answer: B.
23. If Center 1 is the only center that recycles wood, then Center 2 cannot recycle wood because Center 2’s materials are contained in Center 1. A valid setup is:
Center 1: glass, newsprint, wood
Center 2: glass, newsprint
Center 3: plastic, tin
So “plastic, tin” could be a complete list for one center. Answer: A.
Final corrected answer key:
1. A
2. C
3. C
4. E
5. E
6. C
7. A
8. D
9. E
10. D
11. A
12. A
13. D
14. E
15. A
16. A
17. D
18. B
19. D
20. C
21. D
22. B
23. A
--
obviously the final corrected answer key is the part that matters because it was all one output and it matches the irl answer key.
also keep in mind this is feeding it the whole thing at once. if you do it question by question it does it even more easily with no need to correct itself with a finalized answer at the end (because this is the cheap non-api version that is trying to solve the prompt in a certain amount of time and minimal tokens) (it had to correct one answer, number 1 from D to A for its "final answer" big deal)
Date: June 24th, 2026 12:40 AM Author: peach pocket flask
honestly it probably will soon and NOBODY is saying it's there right now. but who fucking cares either way, LAW isn't the be-all and end-all of intellect or human accomplishment
Date: June 24th, 2026 5:56 AM Author: heady zippy gas station
Do you think machines will even need to be "lawyers"? Or is the "law" going to become compressed into a few lines of automated self-executing network protocol?
Tech giants have already built their own extra-judicial enclaves. If a developer makes an app that violates their policy, they don't have to call EPAH and file a "lawsuit". They deplatform them and the developer's "business" turns into a blackhole of automated compliance e-mails. What would make anyone think business is going to continue into the direction of MOAR COURTS, MOAR LAWYERS?
Date: June 24th, 2026 11:13 PM Author: peach pocket flask
cq, soon code will enforce laws and eliminate most kinds of "legal disputes" in the first place. maybe the lawyers will display outstanding SELF-PRESERVATION and lobby the government and pull word tricks to keep their jobs, but that will only delay the inevitable. and for a while we'll probably still need them for niche areas, like AI law, since I doubt even the LW guys will want machines directly governing themselves (even if they're governing pretty much everything else).
but during our lifetime, I think most lawyers will get displaced rather than the profession being eliminated completely. there'll be a transition period where MEATBAG LITIGATORS like EPAH are still needed, but not nearly as many because most of the research will be done by the MACHINE. EPAH will have to accept - embrace - this to keep his job. and then he will just proofread, fact-check, seethe, and show up to court as a warm body. imho.
Date: June 25th, 2026 1:05 PM Author: chocolate histrionic queen of the night clown
The other possibility is that AI makes it easier for people and corps to litigate over and research bs that they would have never litigated over or researched in the past. Lawyers will be needed to fight over the competing legal doctrines/gray areas where there's no right answer. I've already seen how clients of our firm using AI actually generate more work for us because their AI slop questions are long tedious memos that require more review than ever. No one can write a short email anymore.
Date: June 26th, 2026 10:40 AM Author: peach pocket flask
that makes total sense as of right now, as AI is horrible at everything involved in the process, but I don't think it'll stay that way forever.
even if the clients are generating slop at home indefinitely, I could imagine AI taking the shitty slop email from the client and parsing it better than a human would. and for the inevitable ambiguity, it would come up with a handful of straightforward questions to ask the client in order to figure out what's ACTUALLY going on and write back to them. and the questions will be so straightforward that even a cognitively atrophied, AI-using moron will be able to answer them adequately, but if they don't, it'll just repeat that process. given that these AI steps will be nearly instantaneous, it will ultimately save time.
Date: June 26th, 2026 10:55 AM Author: heady zippy gas station
I feel like The Law is exactly the sort of thing current AI systems would be good at and make easy as fuck, and the people saying otherwise either expect it to do their entire job while they just sit there or are threatened by it. It does reading comp and logical reasoning more accurately than any human and you can use it to refine ideas and wording so what more could you really ask for?
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:03 AM Author: heady zippy gas station
Yeah, although one caveat is that I think people who already have strong reading comp and writing and LR skills underestimate the ability of AI's useful ness for someone who doesn't already have those things though.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:06 AM Author: peach pocket flask
cr especially because it's currently so slop-coded that people with verbal skills correctly recognize its default voice as SPS, and that probably causes a lot of people to miss the powerful reasoning that's happening behind the scenes
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:11 AM Author: heady zippy gas station
Yeah the writing sounds like shit most of the time, but the reasoning is solid. Once in a while it will give me some good writing, but seems like it is only when I need it for something important
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:00 AM Author: heady zippy gas station
Well yeah, it is lowering the cost of thinking and articulation so people who previously had a vague worry can now produce a ten-page memo about it. Not that the stuff was previously important, but this is still a result of people extending their intelligence. Previously they had vague feelings and senses about stuff they couldn't quite express, now they can. Eventually I'm sure the noise will settle and people will be satisfied they don't need to surface obscure doctrines, edge cases etc.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:16 AM Author: peach pocket flask
I wonder if LTM has ever tried feeding a client's slop into AI and asking, "wtf are they trying to say and what are the ambiguities I should ask them about"? I bet even now, it would be decent at that. I think the prompt would need to be designed pretty carefully to be heavy on the "looking out for ambiguities" part rather than jumping to conclusions or hallucinating. or maybe it would have to do multiple passes.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:18 AM Author: Confused glassy theatre
right as tboxtp so amply displays, the fundamental problem is that Engineers simply do not have the faintest concept of how the Law works. So when they try to program their AI to do "legal analysis" they're just not even wrong.
"what are the ambiguities I should ask them about" is a completely incoherent question in this context and won't result in a usable/meaningful response.
I understand that you "feel" that I'm wrong about this and will argue with me for some reason, but I'm actually right btw.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:21 AM Author: Confused glassy theatre
what LLMs probably can do well (although I haven't tried this) would be, say, in the context of a 12b6 motion to dismiss where the entire "universe" is constrained artificially to the facts as alleged in the pleadings. If you were to download 30-40 other Complaints on the same subject, 30-40 other MTDs, and the Courts' orders on those MTDs, it could probably do a very good job of pulling out the relevant threads and telling you what arguments are stronger or weaker in this context.
But that would end up being more work than just writing the MTD. And of course it assumes this whole preexisting corpus of documents in the first place.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:24 AM Author: peach pocket flask
I don't think you read what I was responding to, Champ. this is what LTM wrote: "I've already seen how clients of our firm using AI actually generate more work for us because their AI slop questions are long tedious memos that require more review than ever."
my reply was about "review[ing]" clients' "AI slop questions," not about legal writing, which I have continually acknowledged it's currently SPS at. but I bet you won't reply to this because you know I'm right and you missed the point.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:32 AM Author: Confused glassy theatre
read my posts again.
In the MTD hypo, I'm not asking it to "write" anything. I'm asking it to *analyse* (in this MTD hypo, to mark the weaker or stronger arguments). I think it would probably do ok. It would not do ok in answering a question like "what in this AI gibberish memo my client sent is ambiguous"
w/r/t writing it is extremely useful at catching typos and careless issues like subject-verb agreement. So far that's the biggest value add I've seen. And that may sound kind of insubstantial or superficial, but it makes the finished effort look a lot more polished.
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:35 AM Author: peach pocket flask
oh, come on. by "legal writing" I obviously mean everything involved in the process of writing legal material, which obviously includes research and analysis. don't be obtuse.
are you going to admit that you misunderstood what I was addressing from LTM's poast?
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:37 AM Author: Confused glassy theatre
"by "legal writing" I obviously mean everything in the process of writing legal material, which obviously includes research/analysis. you cannot decouple the two. don't be obtuse. "
Well this is what I meant when I said Engineers simply don't understand the Law, and are very stubborn in insisting that they actually do. Legal research, legal analysis, and legal writing are three extremely different skills. (their irl value btw is analysis>>>>writing>research.)
Date: June 26th, 2026 11:39 AM Author: peach pocket flask
ok, then take the W if I was overgeneralizing about what AI is bad at so far. the only reason I mentioned it was to contrast what I WASN'T talking about to what I WAS talking about. but you won't address what I WAS talking about because you know I'm right and you missed the point.
Date: June 26th, 2026 12:35 PM Author: peach pocket flask
what's different between you annoying smug lawyer faggots and an engineer who's at least as smart as you is that I always acknowledge when someone points out I'm wrong about something (like when I used "legal writing" as shorthand for analysis too, which again I did mentally flag but didn't bother fixing because it was so tangential). you just disappear from a thread if you're proven wrong (while continuing to poast elsewhere, so it's not like you got back to wageslaving). LOL
Date: June 26th, 2026 12:41 PM Author: Aqua Apoplectic Milk
have a case in litigation dealing with creosote groundwater contamination at a former railroad tie plant. New associate here sent me a brief that was clearly written with ChatGPT, somehow the word "doggo" was in there eleven times