Date: July 18th, 2026 10:00 PM Author: onyx heady ticket booth sex offender
It’s a very Nolan-esque telling but a faithful telling. Only thing it didn’t really land was Odysseus’ own hubris. And I wish they had done a more faithful version of the Cyclops story.
OP is a shitlib who has been spamming nonstop in favor of this movie for days even before supposedly watching it. Even if this post is not flame, his opinion is not exactly impartial.
Love this 70 IQ poast of his from 3 days ago defending the tranny nig casting
Date: July 18th, 2026 10:05 PM Author: onyx heady ticket booth sex offender
He somehow managed to make it into a mystery that’s revealed in a final staccato series of shots that ties back to the destruction of Troy as some kind of original sin. It’s very Nolan-esque. But even he only used cuts every fourth second in this film. There are some shots that last for nearly seven seconds.
Date: July 19th, 2026 9:15 AM Author: judgmental ultramarine stead
I liked it, it's visually stunning.
Wish they would've showed Odysseus dicking down Circe and Calypso. He fucked the shit out of both of them for years, had kids with Circe, and then was just like "welp ... I better head on out." Could've been home after like 2 years.
The final slaughter scene was weak I thought. In the book I remember him and his son basically fighting back to back and just pwning the fuck out of everyone.
Date: July 19th, 2026 2:37 PM Author: Self-absorbed School
People will always find something to be mad about online
if it were really faithful it would be boring and weird as fuck. everybody would be like why did odysseus stay and fuck the witch, that makes no sense. why did they talk so much about foot washing protocols. why was penelope such a flat character. etc. frankly when you read the "original" a lot of stuff is missing, not always internally consistent, certainly not logical in the way modern audiences would relate to.
(also nobody really knows how to make a faithful adaptation of a story that comes from oral tradition of 700 years, which was itself adapted for the classical greek audiences. the classical story we know was already modified for people to whom the original cultural context was alien.)
I thought the film was phenomenal. Beautiful, tense, well acted, imaginative, spooky, weird, and tragic.
Date: July 19th, 2026 3:41 PM Author: Self-absorbed School
Im so mad that Helen is BLACK it’s literally the worst thing to happen to me, a man who inherited Western Tradition. I’m not going to stop talking about it online. I can’t watch movies any more because it makes me so mad.
The point is this movie is shitlib propaganda in its very conception with heavy-handed lecturing about migration, feminism/toxic masculinity, evils of nationalism, etc and the pervaisve casting of trannies and nigs is but a symptom of this movie's purpose as woke propaganda.
But I and others have made that point ad nauseam. You seem dull, but not too dull to grasp it.
Throughout the epic, strangers are welcomed or rejected according to Zeus’ sacred laws of hospitality, and civilisations are judged by how they treat those who arrive at their shores. In an era where migrants, refugees and even neighbours are increasingly imagined as dangerous threats to be treated with suspicion, Nolan’s adaptation reminds us how easily people convince themselves they are heroes, while viewing everyone else as invaders.
This movie's pro-migration subversion of xenia is not at all how xenia was perceived by the Greeks. Nolan's interview where he says xenia (which he misdefines) is the basis of the Golden Rule was so bizarre and telling. The Greco-Roman world had no analogies of the Golden Rule, which was an entirely innovation of 1st Century Palestine. Greek xenia is reciprocal and status-based, while the Golden Rule was universal and unconditional. Nolan's misinterpretation of Greek guest rites is not an accident. Connveniently, this misreading enables the pro-migrant messaging Nolan wanted to project (glad youre no longer denying it's pro-migrant).
E.g., Julian the Apostate's observations on the advantages of Christianity over paganism:
"These impious Galileans not only feed their own poor, but ours also; welcoming them into their agapae, they attract them, as children are attracted, with cakes."
Since im a retard, spell out how it is embarrassing for me to quote a shitlib praising the pro-migrant messaging and spelling out how precisely the film is pro-migrant.
And yet you are utterly incapable of articulating how or why this obvious and common interpretation of the movie, noted by libs and conservatives, is wrong.
The analogy would be making Anne Frank black along with several dozen other Jews, changing the ideology the Nazis support to communism and making them trans, etc etc. Because it's not just one character being changed in the movie, its systematic and also involves changing the message.
Of course the intellectually dishonest libs defending this movie reduce the issue to 3 minutes of black Helen in order to avoid grappling with their opponents on the actual terms.
Ah yes, Hollywood movies, famously the artistic medium only enjoyable by people with a fertile imagination and not the unwashed unimaginative masses who couldn't even plow through a short story. You got me there sir. Sorry we cant all have the imagination to power through The Avengers Part XIV