Date: October 17th, 2026 2:07 AM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
This is a guy who lives in mental poverty. He is utterly worthless as a thinker and no institution of learning anywhere in the world would take him seriously. His crutch is the internet. If not for the fact that tech entrepreneurs have built him this playground to spend his days in, he would be howling at the moon. He is destined to be utterly disregarded as a scholar and philosopher for all time. He is already forgotten like the living dead. Nothing he could possibly do could overcome his intellectual irrelevance. He is utterly doomed to obscurity. If not for bugging us all the time on this site no one would know who he is. No one would read a word he wrote without the power of technology. He is a nuisance and a pest. We have to accept this.
Date: October 17th, 2026 11:41 AM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Replying as myself I would say I'm by far the smartest person who has ever poasted here and it's not close. As for impact I would say global at a minimum but possibly on a solar level if not interstellar.
Date: October 17th, 2026 11:37 AM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
You really think he's engaging with ideas? It's unreadable AI psychobabble. What ideas has he engaged with? Evil in the Godhead? No one knows what the fuck he means at all lol..
And as for a good time the guy seems pretty nasty to me. He lashes out constantly at haters, real or perceived.
Date: October 17th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
He puts himself out there the way some science fag in the 1500s spent every waking minute trying to disprove Copernicus and the heliocentric model of the solar system. It's very brave to be wrong and waste everybody's time *farts cum*
Date: October 17th, 2026 11:45 AM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
His AI psychobabble is so incoherent and lacking in any relevant insight and actionable information that he can neither be right nor be wrong per se. He's just blabbing. Words with no meaning. He's sincerely retarded and useless, I will say.
His words clearly have meaning, even if the ultimate worldview he presents is deeply flawed, and even if he should be reading sources himself rather than relying too heavily on AI. I'm glad he brings real ideas with abstract complexity (cf. shitty, braindead news of the day threads) to the board. He could be a better intellectual, and gunner's parody of his vices and failings is absolutely 180, but he is certainly an intellectual and valuable contributor to the board. Your hubris otoh is insane.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:15 PM Author: Avocado Personal Credit Line
What lex is saying is objectively correct. It can be true that the stuff consuela writes about is not completely stupid or worthless AND that it is funny to parody him at the same time.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:23 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Instead of beating around the bush why don't you step up to the plate big boy and do what has not occurred even once ITT which is that you lay out and explain one philosophical concept Consuela has raised in your own words, thus proving a single transfer of a concrete idea. Do this and I will be amazed, and don't be vague.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:07 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
What the fuck are you smoking? In a nutshell name one, for the love of God, name one concrete idea or intellectual concept Consuela has introduced that is worth repeating, in your own words and not using vague indecipherable concepts like 'it's about Abraxis' but broken down into plain English you could explain to a 5th grader?
These are not hard concepts to look up yourself if you have any philosophical acumen, and the benchmark for an idea's worthiness of discussion is absolutely not simplicity to the point that a child could understand
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:11 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Nonresponsive. The fact that you can't even spell it out in your own words tells me any any honest interlocutor everything they would need to know. I'm sure off the cuff you could easily explain a major core concept by Hegel or Heiddiger or what have you but when it comes to Hermes of the Threshold you can't get past Abraxis or Evil in the Godhead or another utterly meaningless statement of psychobabble pablum. Consuela's thoughts are beyond worthless. They are a literal zero. They cannot even be tested explained or passed on to another person. Nothing can be derived from his words.
These are absolutely retarded goalposts so I don't feel the need to play the game. Just look up the problem of evil, dualism, and gnosticism. You can figure out the rest from there.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:20 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
The core concepts of evil, dualism, and gnosticism are clearly defined and can be easily understood and explained to a 5th grader, thus disproving your own assertion that it's a pointless exercise to be necessary to philosophical inquiry. It is in fact an empirical truth that in any philosophical treaties there must fundamentally exist core terms, concepts, and components which are clearly defined and easily understood before more extensive arguments can be made. Without fundamental building blocks how could we have any phenomenological understanding of anything?
Terms and concepts are the fundamental building blocks of philosophy. How could you even dispute this? My assertion has always been that the terms Consuela uses are ill-defined, misnomers, or psychobabble with no inherent underlying meaning. Therefore, I argue, no concrete claims can be made about historical work at all. It's so poorly written and defined that his meaning is ephemeral, if it exists at all.
Are you really going to bow out now rather than engage with my rock solid cogent argument I've laid out before you?
"This perspective can be looked at from an apophatic (via negativa) angle: knowing or describing God by negation - saying what God is not, and he is not any one side of the opposites, or it can be looked at from a cataphatic (via positiva) angle: knowing or describing God by affirmation - saying what God is using positive statements, as the ultimate unity of opposites.
This is a conception of God that Jung called Abraxas in his Liber Novus, and it is a horrifying concept: God as not just all good but all good and all evil, everything - not a trinity but a quaternity: the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost, and Satan."
You don't need to know the history of abrasax as a late antique demonic figure, or any other quasi-mythic figures from that era, to understand consuela's definitions. They're Jungian clothes wrapped around perfectly comprehensible concepts (note: they're not psychobabble just because they come from Jung, plenty of 19th century philosphers are looking for Hermetic wisdom as well). Consuela lays the important parts out just fine.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:50 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
I appreciate that you took the time to type this out but I can't help but feel sincerely that this could be dramatically simplified. We don't need to bring up Jung or the history of philosophy to define these terms... You're saying that Consuela is saying that given a binary with all conceptual and holy Good on one side and all conceptually unholy and evil on the other, that God cannot be defined by either binary, and rather that he contains both sides and is himself the whole? Is that what this all boils down to? The assertion that because God is everything he must contain evil as well because He created it?
OK but I think this is concept has been around for millenia and is strictly rejected by church teachings. I guess if you're going to go outside the church and profess a different religion but this is not Christianity, this is not Trinitarian theology. He is proposing a non-Christian worldview which is fine if that's what he wants to do. I'm not sure how philosophically interesting or relevant it is to propose a gnostic religion but I guess if he enjoys mulling it over. Seems like there ought to be more to it than hypothetically if God contains all he also contains evil. Lot of words he used to explain something pretty simple, the academic value of which is highly questionable.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:58 PM Author: Avocado Personal Credit Line
jfc idk about that one. it is interesting that the Universe seems to acquire "meaning" like evil at some point, at the point where observers cross a certain threshold of awareness of their own existence. but the problem of evil as traditionally formulated has little meaning. considering the chances god exists are 0
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:02 PM Author: Avocado Personal Credit Line
when people invoke god in general it is just being way too philosophical and abstract. like what if the moon were made of cheese? the entire thing is just ridiculous to me. like sure in some fictional world an all powerful being could exist but i dont get the point of the speculation
Exactly. He uses well defined terms from a religious tradition, changes their meaning, and then declares the new religion made from those new terms correct. It is an incoherent project.
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:03 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
He distorts all meaning. You can't pin him down on anything. This guy has written hundreds of thousands if not millions of words and our brightest minds on this bort have said it boils down to 'life is complicated' and 'God contains evil because he contains everything.' I mean, great. But these concepts have been around for thousands of years. Sure, they're interesting to mull over. But if you're really passionately interested in answering big questions you can do a lot better than the Thought of Consuela. A LOT better.
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:09 PM Author: Avocado Personal Credit Line
Your original point though was that it is COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS just words on the page devoid of all meaning though. Now you are saying "Can do A LOT BETTER". You have moved the goalposts considerably.
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:14 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Dude I 100% stand by completely meaningless. If you write millions and millions of words and it boils down to a platitude like life is hard then yeah, that is meaningless lol. Also, despite my pulling yours and lex's teeth to get an answer, it's still actually fundamentally unclear that that is in fact what Consuela is arguing, as pointless as it is, I actually think we as interpreters of his work are forcing meaning out of his work that's not even there.
While we're all arguing that in the midst of millions of words somewhere in there it MIGHT actually say that life is hard, it probably doesn't actually say that anywhere explicitly. We are teasing that out of his psychobabble because we are desperate for a narrative to cling to. But the truth is, it's not actually there in the text. Hth
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:36 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I've been very impressed how you've remained composed, patient, and thoughtfully respoond to some of the dumbest shit on this bort but it's also great to see thst even you have a breaking point lol
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:45 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I dedicated like three hours to vibecoding that one night I couldn't get to sleep for a sunrise hike. It's annoying that you continue criticizing other people's level of engagement here when my megapoaster tracker showed the only time you take a break is to sleep.
Consuela is coherent, thoughtful, and intelligent. His theories are deeply flawed and sometimes just objectively wrong. But he is always saying something. Meanwhile you've generated thousands of words ITT just to express "consuela is dumb"
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:57 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
I was only like 6th or 7th overall and while I do poast all day I almost never poasted a lot at a time. I trickle throughout the day without ever getting too invested meanwhile you're the undisputed king of subthread wastelands. The only reason you don't poast more is that engagement is way down and your audience dwindled. If this place ever grew in users you would be right back here effort poasting nonstop. Meanwhile I mostly poast funny things and forcememes. Your level of give a shit about this place has always been way higher than mine. I sprinkle random little bits throughout the day for amusement. You've spent way more time here actually focused and engaging. You also care deeply about your reputation and persona, as much as TSINAH or anyone whose identity is completely wrapped up in it.
Consuela is neither thoughtful, nor intelligent. He is verbose but he can barely spell, punctuate, abandoned stringing his own sentences together years ago. He distorts meaning and twists ideas, rarely settling on anything coherent. He has no intellectual value and nothing can be gleaned from his work. Millions of words just to say 'life is complicated' is not a win, it is not a W, it's actually just dogshit. Deeply flawed and objectively wrong don't go far enough. It is totally meaningless psychobabble. I made this thread as a PSA to the bort to raise awareness about his inherent stupidity. I think people who have gotten into the weeds and wasted a ton of time toying with him for amusement has run its course. It's time we move forward as a community beyond memes about Abraxas and Evil in the Godhead
It was funny for 5 minutes but now it's over. We can't waste any more mental energy on this clown. His 15 minutes are up. I worry that unfortunately you're going to milk another two years out of this bit because you enjoy messing with lolcows as one of your primary hobbies in life. But I had to put out the word and spell it out plainly for all to see so hope I never have to hear from this guy again, although I have a creeping suspicion you're going to start another parody about him within the hour.
Date: October 17th, 2026 2:02 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Nonresponsive.
And furthermore your reductionist attitude undermines the poetry and efficacy of my prose which one day will be quoted from here to Tamil Nadu for its brilliance.
I'm actually crucified between the opposites of mocking him with hilarious abraxis godhead memes on the one hand, and wanting to absolutely destroy his heretical Satanism on the other. Is there a framework for this i can use to understand the place of evil in this situation?
Date: October 17th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
I think you should pivot to destroying his heretical Satanism. He needs someone to engage him directly and isn't smart enough to understand most of your mockery toward him.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:04 PM Author: Adult Friendship Finder
Yeah this is the actual problem with consuela. He's extremely dishonest and fundamentally so. His whole "psyche" is deeply dishonest (he's jewish btw)
All of his "intellectual output" is fundamentally dishonest and backwards-constructed as a means to an end (to convince himself and others that He Is God)
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:14 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
You're overanalyzing his work. His writing does not espouse any coherent theory that can be pointed at, discussed, or be determined. It cannot be argued one way or another. It's just a morass of meaningless words.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:27 PM Author: Avocado Personal Credit Line
human beings are often caught between competing values that are equally legitimate but can't be fully reconciled. For example, honesty and compassion can conflict without either being wrong. He calls this the "crucifixion of opposites." His point is that psychological maturity means learning to live with these contradictions and take responsibility for your choices rather than looking to religion or ideology to resolve them for you
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:37 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Woah? You mean morality is complex and as humans we have to navigate competing sentiments about what to do, who to be, and how to behave?
Hello? Mom? I just turned 12 and I have some very important Thoughts about life!!!!
This guy wrote thousands of pages just to come to 'morality is complex and the human journey is sophisticated and contains contradictions'? What a fucking limp dick lol
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:40 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
If you wrote thousands of pages just to come to the conclusion that 'life is complicated' I would make call out threads calling you out for it, too. I think you're dumb, but not that dumb! In the echoing words of GJR, you're simply higher up the totem pole.
You could summarize the prima pars of Thomas Aquinas as "god is the source of being". You are moving goalposts so hard ITT. That morality is complicated and involves paradoxical dualities is well worth spending thousands of pages exploring. He is exploring coherent ideas in a place for exploring ideas. What more do you want? None of us are Kant.
Date: October 17th, 2026 12:57 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Finally we can agree on none of us being Kant.
I think it's fair to say that if your passionate interest is philosophy and you care a lot about morality then it is a fair question to ask and explore and devote your time and effort to.
There's a really good professor whose old lectures are on YouTube. Look up Michael Sugrue. This guy summarizes the philosophies of most of the historically famous philosophers in one hour lectures. He tackles tough intellectual and moral questions through the lens of various philosophers throughout history who also asked these questions. I think he does a really good job of communicating and explaining complex topics. Unlike Consuela, he taught at Princeton. I think we already have some pretty strong tentpoles in the humanities to go to for life's big questions.
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:10 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
Reading comp?
I said 9 times that his thoughts are totally worthless, he has zero value as a scholar, no one takes him seriously and he will never be remembered for anything... What part of complete waste of time did I not cover?
Date: October 17th, 2026 2:47 PM Author: Emerald Theater Stage
There's no one whose against me who has a shred of respectable intelligence anyways. Unlike Consuela I'm not gonna make a 20,000 words poast about how all the dumbest people hate me.
Date: October 17th, 2026 3:37 PM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
There's no way he or anyone else can read this thread and not describe you as intellectually arrogant and verbose. I'll be waiting with bated breath for him to show up and say you're concise and humble.
lolll. well it's a different type of verbosity from Consuela's; he writes really long and dense sentences with a lot of commas whereas you just repeat the same thing over and over in shorter sentences
Date: October 17th, 2026 7:54 PM Author: Stimulating Hell Voyeur
I think it's actually a "surrogate activity" to such an extent that it degrades the value of what it could've been if solely sincere. his sense of self is based on having a blog.
ironic, since a better jungian/gnostic would know how not to do that.
Date: October 17th, 2026 7:07 PM Author: Richard Ames
Agreed. I don’t get the over the top Consuela hate. People bitch about a lack of content —> someone delivers tons of content —> people rip on the person.
You don’t even need to agree with all of his perspectives, he seems directionally correct in many ways. And even if not, who cares. Some wild conspiracy shit is fun.
His most interesting and important work is his investigations into Jewish control structures. Who else is saying that Lubavitch / Schneerson killed Stalin? If he would spend more time investigating these things he could actually get really good and would have a huge readership. His philosophy may or may not have some value but is a waste of time either way
Date: October 17th, 2026 1:25 PM Author: Light Medicated New Version
We have to face the facts: Goy Superstar is a poor thinker.
This is a guy who lives in mental poverty. He is utterly worthless as a thinker and no institution of learning anywhere in the world would take him seriously.
His crutch is the internet. If not for the fact that tech entrepreneurs have built him this playground to spend his days in, he would be howling at the moon. He is destined to be utterly disregarded as a scholar and philosopher for all time.
He is already forgotten like the living dead. Nothing he could possibly do could overcome his intellectual irrelevance. He is utterly doomed to obscurity. If not for bugging us all the time on this site no one would know who he is. No one would read a word he wrote without the power of technology.
He is a nuisance and a pest. We have to accept this.