These criminal trials regarding the consensually of intercourse from 20 years ago are so insane
My working theory is it’s simply to drive down fertility rates by making consensual sexual encounters an open legal question, and they were just made examples of to drive the new arrangement into the heads of the public
Why these two specifically though, and Weinstein and such? Perhaps they pissed off the wrong people
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:34 AM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
Rape and sexual assault weren't investigated or prosecuted hard unless there was substantial evidence, which meant a lot of women with legitimate claims were ignored or brushed under the rug. And cases on the line or skeezy but not illegal were snickered at. Look at how Lewinsky was treated by the media and Epstein was treated by his social circle in the 90s versus today.
Since then there's been a massive overcorrection, which is often what happens when things change. Also Brand being a celebrity whose star has faded factors in. This happens a lot with celebs and powerful people. Just look at Weinstein.
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:40 AM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
Yes it does. You're just hunting for a conspiracy because you can't accept that cultural and societal changed occur without some group orchestrating it. The reasons #metoo and it's consequences occurred when it did are myriad, it wasn't because some central banker decided to.
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:48 AM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt)
Not one that you'll accept but that's how the world works. This is the root cause of your conspiratorial nature: an unwillingness to accept that the world is chaotic and uncertain.
The biggest reason is that women have been gaining more social and political power since womens liberation, but no one could predict exactly when we'd start treating rape more seriously and to what degree we'd overcorrect and exactly how that would manifest.
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:46 AM Author: harry potter and the nihilists of azkaban
Weinstein was doing horrific stuff and there was evidence that the community he was a part of was helping him pressure victims to cover it up. This is a recurring issue with jewish "boys clubs" type environments, apparently at varying levels of scale, and jewish women I have met have encouraged me to speak on this aggressively as sometimes it's the only way to make it heard
Excellent producer though and it's a shame it tarnished his legacy as I liked his work on films bigly
Admittedly I don't know much about the Masterson case. The whole topic is dismal tbh and makes me pine occasionally for what the orthos and mormons do regarding gender relations, the Pence rule lifestyle, as it is clear that both 1. some women will just say anything and have no compunctions about ruining a man's reputation with a false claim and 2. some men actually are just flat out rapenigging it up out there and must be punished severely
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:16 AM Author: Richard Ames
My guess is it's primarily driven by hyper-overzealous DA types who are also hyper-political.
You have to just lol at the UK. They cover up rape gangs but aggressively go after people with political views they don't like for "crimes" they committed 20+ years ago. LMAO.
The other piece is that these sorts of things are useful for weaponizing public opinion even if the cases go sideways. Google Russell Brand and you get endless news articles and aggregator sites talking about "rape." Even if he were found innocent (or later has the convictions overturned), huge numbers of people now just think "rape" when they see his name.
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:27 AM Author: Now where are we on the Epstein Files
scientology at one point was a legitimate threat to hollywood power. russel brand simply went off the globalist reservation as noted above. not that hard to figure out