The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
    17 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
so AI isnt really solving all of these problems, just stealing user input info?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 14th, 2026 9:58 AM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134761) |
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:00 AM Author: Violent aphrodisiac whorehouse mood so it's basically google? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134764) |
 |
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:10 AM Author: Big toaster (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134782) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 4:48 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Chrome Church Building Messiness *looks up the key companies developing AI*
*notices Google*
*nods* |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 4:58 PM Author: Lilac Useless Genital Piercing yes, its google but friendlier, faster, and 20% more inaccurate. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135623) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:30 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic Yeah because it definitely could have solved a millennium problem just by looking at peoples prompts, which is why it took millions of tokens and a powerful internal model and why none of these users came forward with their own solutions! (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134814) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:41 AM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/09/13/he-was-close-1-million-breakthrough-then-openai-swooped/ (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134838) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:48 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic You are so gullible if you believe the "perhaps the machine learned his secret work and used it against him" narrative. Open AI has already done an more extensive investigation and demonstrated this was impossible (article even refers to this). There was overlap by being in the same research program, but the final proof released by open ai was radically different and departed radically from what the guy was doing. Also lol at the idea he would have solved it. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134846) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:48 AM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office sup sam (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134849) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:52 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic If it was as simple as stealing prompts why would they need an internal model thats way smarter than the public frontier + millions in credits and thousands of agents to do it? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135038) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 6:59 PM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office to lie (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135897) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 10:55 AM Author: indecent violent partner (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134861) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:17 AM Author: Pea-brained range “AI” didn’t solve shit, it just stole a real mathematician’s proof and that gay no-talent jew Altman claimed it as his (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134922) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:20 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic (gullible retard) (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134933) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:21 AM Author: Pea-brained range Oh damn that really settles the matter lmfao (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134935) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:23 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic Durrrrr open ai released their proof so I guess the mathematician now can release his and show they are the same durrr. Except no. The exact opposite has happened and their proof is radically different from what the guy was doing other than being in the same research program. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134945) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 2:36 PM Author: Doobsian razzmatazz spot Altman said the two mathematicians deserve credit while also insisting they did nothing (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135294) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 9:17 PM Author: Magical address His name? Albert Einstein (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50136194) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 2:16 PM Author: boyish shrine dingle berry Nooo my tokensssss millions of tokennzsths (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135258) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:04 AM Author: Doobsian razzmatazz spot Shoulda listened to NSAM (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134879) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:09 AM Author: crusty site 90%+ of open source projects are on Github > Microsoft > OpenAI > Pentagon (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134895) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:42 AM Author: Deep filthpig (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135000) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:25 AM Author: Diverse jewess "Buckmaster and Alpöge had been using AI models to help accelerate their work. Buckmaster worked with commercially available versions of ChatGPT and Claude, paid for out of his research funds, and Alpöge worked with internal models accessible to him as an Anthropic employee."
I wanted AI to solve the problem, but not like this, not by them. |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:50 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic Whats funny is that the thing they were working on isn't even the same, its just related. Alpoge and Buckmaster's work concerned forced Euler, whereas open ais result establishes blowup for unforced Navier–Stokes. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135029) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:11 PM Author: Diverse jewess How does the "blow up" solve the problem? Article explained what the blow ups were and how they related to the problem, but not how they lead to solving it. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135097) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:28 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic The clay formulation is an either or and they chose route b, the part about smoothness assumptions. A globally smooth solution cannot have its velocity blow up at finite time. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135127) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:25 AM Author: hairraiser windowlicker what’s the difference between that and AI waiting three weeks to solve it until after the academics’ work was published? It’s not like a NYU prof can burn $22 million of takes to solve it himself (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134952) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Diverse jewess This is a more significant issue, if it's true: "“What I don’t think the mathematical community will accept is the write-up as it is,” Gomez-Serrano said of OpenAI’s solution, which he is currently trying to read. “It’s incomprehensible.”"
If true, OpenAI didn't solve anything. That's the story. |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic You don't think open ai's internal team of mathematicians are a little bit more intelligent than the cranks trying to claim their proof was stolen? And you don't think their researchers sent it to top external mathematicians before publishing? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134994) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:41 AM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office no (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50134999) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic They do idiot. They use their internal team to review it, which includes fields medalist Jacob Tsimerman + machine proof checkers like LEAN4 and agda, and also send it externally to top mathematicians to verify. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135006) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:55 AM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office you sound really confident for a lawyer (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135050) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:07 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic They circulated the Erdos proof among their network of top external mathematicians before publishing it, and this one is much more consequential. I'm not saying its impossible that they didn't, but the alternative is pretty absurd. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135087) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:09 PM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office do u remember what year we live in? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135093) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:46 AM Author: Violent aphrodisiac whorehouse mood no (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135014) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:16 PM Author: Diverse jewess I'm highly skeptical of OpenAI and I don't fully trust them to have thoroughly vetted their proof rather than rushing it out to try to scoop others working on the same topic, including Anthropic. If they had, why not say it? "Professors so and so vetted the proof and confirm it's correct."
The quote above is from a professor at Brown. He may be wrong, biased, or a crank, but it's not some guy on the street. And he didn't just say he's not sure. He said it's "incomprehensible." Almost as if AI wrote it... |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:25 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic The guy from Brown you are talking about is legit, but look at what he's saying. He is saying the write-up itself is hard to understand, not that he found a flaw or that he thinks its wrong. He thinks the paper wasn't well written. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135120) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:52 PM Author: Diverse jewess If it's strictly about the paper and not about the proof or whether OpenAI really solved the problem, it's a pretty misleading passage in the article. It suggests there is something more going on than just a poorly drafted paper. It says the community won't accept it. And I for one would be shocked (shocked!) that the Washington Post would include a misleading and incendiary passage suggesting that there is a problem with the proof itself if that's not the case. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135158) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 7:33 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic Yeah the quote said the community wouldn't accept the paper itself as written, not that the mathematical content or proof was wrong. The paper is written in this overly complicated way that no normal person would ever read and understand. It isn't nonsense, but it isn't readable by humans. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135956) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 11:47 AM Author: indecent violent partner The writeup is balls but the actual proof is written in a formal mathematical language called Lean that enables full ironclad verification. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135020) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:12 PM Author: Diverse jewess Does this have said full ironclad verification? If so, why is there a dispute? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135100) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 12:19 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic I think most people accept that it is legit. Lean isn't ironclad though. Lean guarantees that given the specific assumptions encoded from it the proof follows. It can't guarantee that the proof actually corresponds to the problem Clay was talking about in its formulation. Maybe some people will offer a legit dispute. I think its low probability that the result collapses completely. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135112) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 2:34 PM Author: Doobsian razzmatazz spot Anyone got a non-AI generated take? (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135291) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 4:56 PM Author: Unhinged stage quadroon Yeah, I thought mathematicians generally accept Lean proofs once the input is verified. (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135616) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 5:04 PM Author: dashing iridescent theatre psychic Sometimes they will argue over whether the assumptions that went into it hold (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135639) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 2:33 PM Author: Doobsian razzmatazz spot ljl I've seen this happen before. SWIM thought he came up with a more elegant explanation for time dilation using Gemini, and he tried to use it to try to patent some kind of GPS device. Eventually no patent lawyer would respond to his emails (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135287) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 1:37 PM Author: Ocher exhilarant abode yes, AI is Jewish (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135210) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2026 2:13 PM Author: aquamarine bearded principal's office finally someone has the balls to say it (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903747&forum_id=2#50135257) |