AOC makes WILD claims on Cornell 7: “Seven men drugged and gang raped a 20-year-old woman. They lured her into a frat house, drugged her with ketamine, and took turns gang raping her for seven hours.”
the most violating thing that happened was the “free pussy” text itself. clearly the guys who showed up thought she’d be super horned up and into it, and when she wasn’t they just kinda listlessly stuck around. the whole thing is just sad, not a hot gangbang at all, but the multiple threesomes that preceded the text were probably a lot better.
Date: October 2nd, 2026 7:47 PM Author: Soggy Razzmatazz Church
consent is a fiction, violation is a fact. nonconsensual sex initiated by a woman is something 50% of guys have experienced at one point or another and don't give a fuck about, they just roll with it (unenjoyably or not) because they've been placed into a milieu where a boner constitutes consent. the same standard should be applied to guy #3 under the circumstances: there was a breakdown in the social milieu such that he had de facto consent, and whatever mixed feelings people may have after the fact are reparable.
the actually objectionable part was the text and everything that ensued from it, it's a massive escalation of stakes and exposure both in terms of the immediate environment and narrative control in the aftermath.
morally speaking the men are guilty of DEFAMATION, not of rape.
Why is it immoral to have sex with a drunk person, who consents, unless they are completely incapacitated? If someone gets very drunk and starts a fight, spends 2K, or decides to quit their job, we generally say they made a drunken decision. Alcohol isn't a magic agency destroyer.
she'd had 10 drinks before it even started, then the ketamine, then more alcohol... what makes you think she wasn't "completely incapacitated"? it's what the "free pussy" text implies too imo. i read it as, "she's too far gone to say no."
Because in her own account to the police she remembers an extreme amount of detail and even in her own account she is not incapacitated, she is making decisions, refusing some requests (and the refusals are complied with), taking care of some of the boys who are throwing up and much more intoxicated than herself.
some women are 180 and take care of other people even when they can't take care of themselves so that doesn't prove much. based on the quantity of what she consumed and the implication of the "free pussy" text, it sounds like she was really far gone. she also said in follow-up texts to the one attractive dude that her memory was hazy or something like that.
"Free pussy" just means there is a girl in that room who is willing to have a gang bang and is letting pretty much anyone do it. "Memory is hazy" doesn't prove incapacitation, alcohol causes anterograde amnesia where memories aren't encoded properly. You can be coherent and actively making all kinds of decisions and not remember later. But in her own statement to police she remembers a ton of stuff. Have you read it? The verbatim version isn't released, but the DA released a paraphrased version with private info redacted.
Would usually tend to agree, but the "free pussy" chats need to be contextualized in light of the texts she sent about the event in the following days, plus her statements to the police, and the accounts the guys are giving in their recent statements. I would be willing to entertain the idea that her statements to police and her characterization of what happened in the text messages she were sent were some crazy compensatory "trauma response" if some evidence comes out that she actually really was in a k-hole for a few hours and a ton of people she didn't allow came in and raped her. But that seems like it would require a video or another witness, unless there are facts being withheld still.
i definitely know of situations where people insisted to themselves and others that an encounter was consensual because they were in denial that they weren't in control
but then obviously there are also situations where they correctly assess it as consensual and then change their mind to protect their self-image or reputation as non-slutty
But it seems the interpretation you are disagreeing over is how intoxicated someone has to be to be incapacitated. But your interpretation of those things seems to rely on knowing how intoxicated she was. I'm not going off of amount of beers, because we don't know she has an accurate memory of number of beers, or over what time period it occurred. I'm going off of the actual account she supposedly gave police about what occurred. Assuming the DA's account is true and what she said is accurate, she doesn't seem incapacitated or too impaired to make decisions or even the most impaired person that was there. I still think if you read it you might change your opinion.
ya i might look into it more at some point and the details may change my mind. the snapchat screenshots were the most damning part of what i've seen, plus the guy (or was it multiple guys?) apologizing afterward. maybe she really was in her right mind and changed her mind afterward but clearly the guys didn't feel good about inviting arbitrary men to come fuck an intoxicated girl, nor should they have.
Date: October 2nd, 2026 8:57 PM Author: soul-stirring forum
Interesting that you only remember the parts of the account that are inculpatory of the accused, and are unfamiliar with the exculpatory aspects. IIRC this pretty much characterizes all of your (persistently) liberal takes on every issue- convinced the leftist take is correct while ostensibly being the world's only rational female (who just happens to have not seen the right-leaning facts), always open to "changing my mind" when you revisit the information which never actually happens.
i have never pretended to be conservative lmao. i'm a registered independent and free thinker who analyzes every issue and situation w/o succumbing to groupthink or respecting any party lines... but certainly left of center
what men don't understand is that the concept of a woman who's open to sex with anyone who drops by is incoherent. 99.999999999999% of women won't consent to sex with a guy without interacting with him first. we just don't work that way. maybe the guy who sent the "free pussy" text didn't understand that either and genuinely meant she's down for whatever, but i really don't think so. it sounds to me like "she's so fucked up she can't say no," not "she's totally in her right mind and just looking for a good time and will have sex with anyone!!"
Date: October 2nd, 2026 8:08 PM Author: rose den blood rage
She is obviously in the 1 in a 1000 women who work differently. I dont know why this is so hard to understand. You are acting as if Lily Philips style turbosluts dont exist but they do even if they are rare.
Watch videos of her. Her manners are not feminine.
was she buff and manly when this happened or did she perhaps become a gym bro in response to a traumatizing experience? i didn't care enough to scroll down on her insta (nor do we know it's the right girl)
Date: October 2nd, 2026 9:04 PM Author: soul-stirring forum
Exactly, see my comment above.
This 1/2 Jewish chick is duplicitous as fuck, legit skilled at pretending to be objective but magically comes down on the leftist side of 100% of issues
i've always described myself as left of Democrats, like since i started poasting in 2009 so idk what your deal is?
you might be confused because i'm skeptical of government and authority in general and you consider that a right-wing posture, but it's not; it just gets attributed to the right because shitlibs tend to be brainwashed sheeple who defer to authority way too much.
idk, the one pic I saw where she was buff it looked like it was some type of effect/filter someone applied, she was standing next to a guy in the gym. but I didn't look at too many pics of her so I could be wrong
Date: October 2nd, 2026 8:29 PM Author: rose den blood rage
It is not just her physique/weightlifting hobby, it is her mannerisms and such that are mannish. And that doesnt seem to have changed in the past 2 years.
Date: October 2nd, 2026 8:16 PM Author: gamers rise up
Wow cool well since sending a text message that says "free pussy" is a crime and in fact is the equivalent of rape yeah I guess you have a good point here wow
and i also think it's fair to lump the consensual ones in with the others as a group ("Cornell 7") because they were complicit in her being loaned out to anyone who decided to show up. they may not have raped her directly but they helped get her raped.
Date: October 2nd, 2026 7:35 PM Author: rose den blood rage
1. Her disappointed response to getting disinvited to her rapists' party at their rape dungeon the following week: "I knew this was going to happen.The woman will always get the short end of the stick."
2. "everyone needs to grow up cause sexuality and sex and s---is changing and stuff like this is going to become more common, I'm also really open minded tho, I love you king."
3. A couple weeks later, but still before she made a police report, the young man told her that he was concerned he'd been "labeled an assaulter" and she responded "I haven't said anything but I do know people are changing the narrative because like in any sexual scenario w one woman and many men the woman was probably the victim."
Date: October 2nd, 2026 7:42 PM Author: rose den blood rage
The Box tp is a BPD slut just like Lucy so she identifies with her. Only by the grace of God did The Box never initiate a false rape hoax in her youth.
Date: October 2nd, 2026 9:08 PM Author: soul-stirring forum
She just hasn't seen the completely exculaptory evidence yet (that every single person who has invested a minute into this retarded farce has seen) - but dont worry, im sure once she sees the info she'll come around!
Millions of woman attempt to go to college to get an education and the patriarchy rapes them into submission. But this time a "fiery" Jane Doe fights back.
Date: October 1st, 2026 9:52 PM Author: rose den blood rage
Ive been told on twitter she was beaten, secretly administered ketamine vaginally, violently gangraped for 7 hours, and had to go to the ER with vaginal tears, pelvic injuries, and bodily bruising
fwiw some people lie to themselves initially because they want to believe they were in control and weren't taken advantage of, then are able to see what happened more clearly when they get some distance from the situation.
how often does this happen compared to cases in which they correctly assess the events as consensual at first and then later decide they were taken advantage of to protect their self-image or reputation? no idea. i'm just saying both can happen.