The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
    3 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
SCOTUS takes up another anti-Asian AA case
| violent wonderful pisswyrm point | 10/19/26 |
| checked out chud | 10/19/26 |
| Talking sapphire haunted graveyard ticket booth | 10/19/26 |
| violent wonderful pisswyrm point | 10/19/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 19th, 2026 12:33 PM Author: violent wonderful pisswyrm point SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog The court will hear argument early next year in a challenge to the process that a Maryland county uses to determine who will be admitted to a group of highly selective public magnet schools.
https://x.com/SCOTUSblog/status/2112202655925985289
==== look at how the MSM frames it: Asians are against boosting Black and Latino enrollment. those Asians!
Supreme Court to hear a new case on race and school admissions, this time in Maryland Plaintiffs allege that the admissions policy for magnet middle schools in Montgomery County is unlawfully aimed at boosting Black and Latino enrollment.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-hear-new-case-race-school-admissions-time-maryland-rcna604328 |
Date: October 19th, 2026 12:37 PM Author: checked out chud Is this jjc (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50196703) |
|
Date: October 19th, 2026 12:38 PM Author: Talking sapphire haunted graveyard ticket booth good but they need to rule against legacies as just AA for birdshits (https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50196705) |
|
Date: October 19th, 2026 4:29 PM Author: violent wonderful pisswyrm point hmm. this could be a reverse willy case.
the question accepted is that given a facially neutral policy, must the plaintiff complaining of racial discrimination prove the case by showing disparate impact. |