The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
    1 poster qualifies.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
Ross Cameron's "Warrior Trading" grift is genius-tier
| Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle. | 11/12/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 12th, 2026 8:30 PM Author: Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle. (πΊπΈ π΅π±) He's a day trader who turned $500 into more than $20M and has had his brokerage transactions independently audited & confirmed to be real. Now, he teaches people how to day trade by offering a subscription-based trading/simulation/chat/video platform where his members can watch him trade in real-time and even mimic his trades.
Realistically, only a couple of things can explain his verified profits:
1. He identifies profitable opportunities independently, with little audience impact. He's just that good/lucky. 2. His trading skill produces profits, and followers improve some executions. 3. Followers supply a large share of the price movement or liquidity that makes his chosen position sizes profitable.
An accounting examination does not distinguish those explanations unless it specifically studies market impact and the counterfactual performance without followers. It's telling that he uses standard entry/exit signals but manually executes trades; he wants to leave room for "human judgment" to prevent him from making a trade he would otherwise make if the number of people watching his live stream were sufficient.
Given that he mostly trades pre-market using a micro-cap momentum strategy, the increased pre-market volatility and decreased pre-market volume means that the impact of his followers may be enough to pad his trades. For example, an average improvement of approximately 2.5 cents per share would equal half his reported 2024 profit (~$1.9M).
Basically, it's the same mechanics as a pump-and-dump, but it's totally legal. Outstanding effort. |